Literature DB >> 12892576

Delay in surgical therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Robert K Nam1, Michael A S Jewett, Murray D Krahn, Michael A Robinette, John Tsihlias, Ants Toi, Minnie Ho, Andrew Evans, Joan Sweet, John Trachtenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Canada, waiting times for cancer care have been increasing, particularly for patients with genitourinary malignancies. We examined whether delay from diagnosis for patients undergoing surgery for clinically localized prostate cancer affects cancer cure rates.
METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study among 645 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 1997, using biochemical recurrence (PSA elevation) and metastasis as endpoints. We examined whether patients who underwent surgery >/= months (delayed surgery group) from the date of diagnosis had reduced recurrence-free survival, compared to patients who had surgery <3 months (early surgery group) from the date of diagnosis, adjusting for grade, stage and PSA level at diagnosis.
RESULTS: The crude 10-year recurrence-free and metastasis-free survival rates for all patients were 71.1% (95% C.I.: 64.9% - 77.3%) and 95.3% (95% C.I.: 91.3% - 99.3%), respectively. Of the 645 patients, 189 (29.3%) had surgery >/= months after diagnosis. The median time from the date of diagnosis to surgery was 68 days (range 15 to 951 days). The 10-year recurrence-free survival was higher for patients who underwent early surgery (74.6%, 95% C.I.: 67.9% - 81.4%) compared to patients in the delayed surgery group (61.3%, 95% C.I.: 46.7% - 76.0%, p=0.05). The crude and adjusted hazard ratios for developing biochemical recurrence for patients in the delayed surgery group were 1.58 (95% C.I.: 1.0 - 2.4, p=0.04) and 1.46 (95% C.I.: 0.9 - 2.3, p=0.09), respectively, compared to patients who underwent early surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: There may exist a possible relationship between delays from diagnosis for radical prostatectomy and prostate cancer cure rates. These findings may have many biases that could not be properly accounted in this retrospective analysis and larger cohort analyses will be required to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12892576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  19 in total

1.  Prostate cancer outcomes and delays in care.

Authors:  Michael E O'Callaghan; Zumin Shi; Tina Kopsaftis; Kim Moretti
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?

Authors:  Jung Ki Jo; Jong Jin Oh; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Optimizing Time to Treatment to Achieve Durable Biochemical Disease Control after Surgery in Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shivanshu Awasthi; Travis Gerke; Jong Y Park; Francis A Asamoah; Vonetta L Williams; Angelina K Fink; Rajesh Balkrishnan; David I Lee; S Bruce Malkowicz; Priti Lal; Jasreman Dhillon; Julio M Pow-Sang; Timothy R Rebbeck; Kosj Yamoah
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  miR-221 Is down-regulated in TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Aida Gordanpour; Aleksandra Stanimirovic; Robert K Nam; Carlos S Moreno; Christopher Sherman; Linda Sugar; Arun Seth
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Does a delay between diagnosis and radical prostatectomy increase the risk of disease recurrence?

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Fernando J Bianco; Stephen Boorjian; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Time between diagnosis and surgical treatment on pathological and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer: does it matter?

Authors:  Mariana Andozia Morini; Roberto Lodeiro Muller; Paulo César Barbosa de Castro Junior; Rafael José de Souza; Eliney Ferreira Faria
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Timing of curative treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Peter C Albertsen; Chris H Bangma; Stephen J Freedland; Markus Graefen; Andrew Vickers; Henk G van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  [Active surveillance for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; S Ahyai; R Heuer; G Salomon; T Schlomm; H Isbarn; L Budäus; H Heinzer; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Cancer survival in Ontario, 1986-2003: evidence of equitable advances across most diverse urban and rural places.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Karen Y Fung; Isaac N Luginaah; Emma Bartfay; Caroline Hamm; Frances C Wright; Madhan Balagurusamy; Aziz Mohammad; Eric J Holowaty; Kathy X Tang
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

10.  Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Marc Zanaty; Mansour Alnazari; Khaled Ajib; Kelsey Lawson; Mounsif Azizi; Emad Rajih; Abdullah Alenizi; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Côme Tolmier; Malek Meskawi; Fred Saad; Raisa S Pompe; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.