Literature DB >> 12892455

Influences of thoracic duct blockage on early enteral nutrition for patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery.

Satoshi Aiko1, Yutaka Yoshizumi, Tomokazu Matsuyama, Yoshiaki Sugiura, Tadaaki Maehara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We have previously reported the beneficial effects of immediate enteral nutrition (EN) after esophageal cancer surgery. This randomized control study was conducted to determine whether immediate EN is beneficial or not for patients whose thoracic ducts were ligated, as well as those whose thoracic ducts were preserved. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who underwent radical resection of the esophageal cancer entered this trial. After stratifying into two groups--patients whose thoracic ducts were preserved [D(+)] and those whose thoracic ducts were ligated [D(-)], they were randomly divided into two groups--the patients who received early EN and those who received parenteral nutrition (PN) followed by delayed enteral feeding. Thus, the number of patients in the D(+)-EN group, D(+)-PN group, D(-)-EN group and D(-)-PN group were 13, 12, 7 and 7, respectively. The mortality and morbidity rates, and several blood chemistries were compared between the EN groups and the PN groups.
RESULTS: Total lymphocyte count showed a significant early increase and serum c-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly decreased in the D(+)-EN group compared to the D(+)-PN group. However those differences were not observed between the D(-) groups. Serum total bilirubin was significantly decreased in the both EN groups compared to the PN groups. The mortality and morbidity rates were not different between the EN group and the PN group in the D(+) patients and also in the D(-) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients whose thoracic ducts were ligated did not obtain any other benefit from early enteral feeding except for bilirubin metabolism. Early enteral feeding is not recommended for patients whose thoracic ducts are ligated during radical resection of a cancer in the thoracic esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12892455     DOI: 10.1007/bf02719376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1344-4964


  26 in total

1.  Thoracic duct drainage.

Authors:  A M Duce; M Sánchez García; M T Barberán; J G Vicent
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-03

Review 2.  Chylothorax.

Authors:  B A Merrigan; D C Winter; G C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Thoracic duct drainage in organ transplantation: will it permit better immunosuppression?

Authors:  T E Starzl; L J Koep; R Weil; C G Halgrimson; J J Franks
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Collateral lymphatico-venous communications after experimental obstruction of the thoracic duct.

Authors:  T Neyazaki; E A Kupic; W H Marshall; H L Abrams
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Increased intrinsic pumping of intestinal lymphatics following hemorrhage in anesthetized sheep.

Authors:  A Hayashi; M G Johnston; W Nelson; S Hamilton; N G McHale
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Inflammation-induced cholestasis.

Authors:  M Trauner; P Fickert; R E Stauber
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.029

7.  Macrophage elimination increases bacterial translocation and gut-origin septicemia but attenuates symptoms and mortality rate in a model of systemic inflammation.

Authors:  G A Nieuwenhuijzen; Y Haskel; Q Lu; R D Berg; N van Rooijen; R J Goris; E A Deitch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Hemodynamic changes after resection of thoracic duct for en bloc resection of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  M Imamura; Y Shimada; T Kanda; T Miyahara; M Hashimoto; T Tobe; T Arai; Y Hatano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Thoracic duct in patients with multiple organ failure: no major route of bacterial translocation.

Authors:  L C Lemaire; J B van Lanschot; C P Stoutenbeek; S J van Deventer; J Dankert; H Oosting; D J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Renal transplantation after thoracic duct drainage.

Authors:  J C Fish; H E Sarles; A Remmers; C M Townsend; J D Bell; M W Flye
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Three-field lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Satoru Matsuda; Hiroya Takeuchi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Enteral and parenteral nutrition in cancer patients, a comparison of complication rates: an updated systematic review and (cumulative) meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Chow; Eduardo Bruera; Jann Arends; Declan Walsh; Florian Strasser; Elisabeth Isenring; Egidio G Del Fabbro; Alex Molassiotis; Monica Krishnan; Leonard Chiu; Nicholas Chiu; Stephanie Chan; Tian Yi Tang; Henry Lam; Michael Lock; Carlo DeAngelis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Prognostic impact of thoracic duct lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Satoru Matsuda; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Hiroya Takeuchi; Shuhei Mayanagi; Tomoyuki Irino; Kazumasa Fukuda; Rieko Nakamura; Norihito Wada; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  Clinical outcome of transthoracic esophagectomy with thoracic duct resection: Number of dissected lymph node and distribution of lymph node metastasis around the thoracic duct.

Authors:  Satoru Matsuda; Hiroya Takeuchi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Ayako Shimada; Kazumasa Fukuda; Rieko Nakamura; Tsunehiro Takahashi; Norihito Wada; Kaori Kameyama; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.