Literature DB >> 12892242

Course of back pain in primary care: a prospective study of physical measures.

Paul Enthoven1, Elisabeth Skargren, Görel Kjellman, Birgitta Oberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe physical measures used in patients with back pain when no specific treatment is given, to examine associations between change over time in these measures and changes in pain and back-related disability, and to study the value of physical measures at baseline and at a 4-week follow-up to predict outcome at 12 months.
DESIGN: A prospective consecutive study.
SUBJECTS: Forty-four patients presenting with low back pain in primary care.
METHODS: The patients underwent a physical examination at baseline and at 4 weeks. Follow-up was carried out using questionnaires until 12 months. Linear regression was used to identify predictors.
RESULTS: Most measures had improved significantly at the 4-week follow-up. Thoracolumbar rotation, isometric endurance back extensors, and fingertip-to-floor distance at 4 weeks were significant predictors for pain intensity and back-related disability at the 12-month follow-up. Eighteen out of 44 patients reported an increase in pain after the assessment of the physical measures at baseline. This group of patients improved more in physical measures between baseline and the 4-week follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Physical measures assessed at the 4-week follow-up, but not at baseline, could provide important additional information for identifying those patients at risk for worse outcome in pain or back-related disability at 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12892242     DOI: 10.1080/16501970306124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  15 in total

1.  How well do observed functional limitations explain the variance in Roland Morris scores in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain undergoing physiotherapy?

Authors:  F Caporaso; N Pulkovski; H Sprott; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian D Mallen; George Peat; Elaine Thomas; Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Clinical prediction rules for physical therapy interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12-18

4.  Age-related differences on low back pain and postural control during one-leg stance: a case-control study.

Authors:  Rubens A da Silva; Edgar R Vieira; Carlos E Carvalho; Marcio R Oliveira; César F Amorim; Elias Nasrala Neto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The effects of movement pattern modification on lower extremity kinematics and pain in women with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Gretchen B Salsich; Valentina Graci; Dwayne E Maxam
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Clinical examination findings as prognostic factors in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisbeth Hartvigsen; Alice Kongsted; Lise Hestbaek
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2015-03-23

7.  Effectiveness of blood flow restricted exercise compared with standard exercise in patients with recurrent low back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shinichi Amano; Arimi Fitri Mat Ludin; Rachel Clift; Masato Nakazawa; Timothy D Law; Laura J Rush; Todd M Manini; James S Thomas; David W Russ; Brian C Clark
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Rehabilitative Principles in the Management of Thoracolumbar Syndrome: A Case Report.

Authors:  Mathew E DiMond
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2017-12-07

9.  The Effects of Vibration and Muscle Fatigue on Trunk Sensorimotor Control in Low Back Pain Patients.

Authors:  Jean-Alexandre Boucher; Jacques Abboud; François Nougarou; Martin C Normand; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Core Muscle Activity, Exercise Preference, and Perceived Exertion during Core Exercise with Elastic Resistance versus Machine.

Authors:  Jonas Vinstrup; Emil Sundstrup; Mikkel Brandt; Markus D Jakobsen; Joaquin Calatayud; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2015-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.