OBJECTIVE: To describe the psychosocial and behavioral functioning, as described by patient, parent and teacher, of a cohort of adolescents who have been previously treated for a brain tumor. METHODS: A cohort of 32 patients, 12-18 years old, were evaluated between 1 and 5 years post-treatment for brain tumor during the patient's regularly scheduled follow-up clinic appointment at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. The Self-Report questionnaire and the Parent-Report of the Behavioral Assessment System for Children (BASC) were administered to the patient and to one of the patient's parents, respectively. In addition, the BASC Teacher-Report was completed by the patient's teacher. Descriptive statistics were generated; binomial distribution analyses were carried out to assess whether the proportion of individuals with impaired performance on each measure exceeded normative expectations. RESULTS: Comparison of the proportion of patients with elevated scores to normative expectations indicated no excess of elevated scores on any of the BASC scales of the Self-Report. However, parents endorsed items in the areas of attention problems and leadership; teachers endorsed items concerning learning problems; and both parents and teachers endorsed items indicative of somatization behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Parent and teacher feedback indicate some level of psychosocial and behavioral morbidity for adolescents treated for a brain tumor; this finding contrasts with adolescent Self-Report indicating no difficulties in behavioral and psychosocial functioning. The extent to which these vulnerabilities impact quality of life and the discrepancy between reporters should be assessed in follow-up studies with a larger cohort of patients.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the psychosocial and behavioral functioning, as described by patient, parent and teacher, of a cohort of adolescents who have been previously treated for a brain tumor. METHODS: A cohort of 32 patients, 12-18 years old, were evaluated between 1 and 5 years post-treatment for brain tumor during the patient's regularly scheduled follow-up clinic appointment at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. The Self-Report questionnaire and the Parent-Report of the Behavioral Assessment System for Children (BASC) were administered to the patient and to one of the patient's parents, respectively. In addition, the BASC Teacher-Report was completed by the patient's teacher. Descriptive statistics were generated; binomial distribution analyses were carried out to assess whether the proportion of individuals with impaired performance on each measure exceeded normative expectations. RESULTS: Comparison of the proportion of patients with elevated scores to normative expectations indicated no excess of elevated scores on any of the BASC scales of the Self-Report. However, parents endorsed items in the areas of attention problems and leadership; teachers endorsed items concerning learning problems; and both parents and teachers endorsed items indicative of somatization behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Parent and teacher feedback indicate some level of psychosocial and behavioral morbidity for adolescents treated for a brain tumor; this finding contrasts with adolescent Self-Report indicating no difficulties in behavioral and psychosocial functioning. The extent to which these vulnerabilities impact quality of life and the discrepancy between reporters should be assessed in follow-up studies with a larger cohort of patients.
Authors: Sumedh Subodh Shah; Anna Dellarole; Eric Cecala Peterson; Amade Bregy; Ricardo Komotar; Philip D Harvey; Mohamed Samy Elhammady Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Thora Gudrunardottir; Birgitta Lannering; Marc Remke; Michael D Taylor; Elizabeth M Wells; Robert F Keating; Roger J Packer Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Kelly R Wolfe; Karin S Walsh; Nina C Reynolds; Frances Mitchell; Alyssa T Reddy; Iris Paltin; Avi Madan-Swain Journal: Child Neuropsychol Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Stephen A Sands; Keith P Pasichow; Rebecca Weiss; James Garvin; Sharon Gardner; Ira J Dunkel; Jonathan L Finlay Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-06-06 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Tara M Brinkman; Chenghong Li; Kathryn Vannatta; Jordan G Marchak; Jin-Shei Lai; Pinki K Prasad; Cara Kimberg; Stefanie Vuotto; Chongzhi Di; Deokumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jamie L Ryan; Michael W Mellon; Katherine W F Junger; Elizabeth A Hente; Lee A Denson; Shehzad A Saeed; Kevin A Hommel Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Glynnis A McDonnell; Christina G Salley; Marie Barnett; Antonio P DeRosa; Rachel S Werk; Allison Hourani; Alyssa B Hoekstra; Jennifer S Ford Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: David K Buchbinder; Michelle A Fortier; Kathryn Osann; Justin Wilford; Violet Shen; Lilibeth Torno; Leonard S Sender; Susan K Parsons; Lari Wenzel Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 1.289