Literature DB >> 12891101

Validation of the new venous severity scoring system in varicose vein surgery.

Stavros K Kakkos1, Marco A Rivera, Miltiadis I Matsagas, Miltos K Lazarides, Peter Robless, Gianni Belcaro, George Geroulakos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We performed this observational study to validate the three components of a new venous severity scoring (VSS) system, ie, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), venous segmental disease score (VSDS), and venous disability score (VDS), and to evaluate VCSS, VDS, and CEAP clinical class and score in quantifying outcome of varicose vein surgery. Patients and methods The study included 45 patients who underwent superficial venous surgery in 48 legs with primary varicose veins. Venous color duplex scanning, clinical examination, and a questionnaire were used preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to assign VSS and CEAP clinical class and score.
RESULTS: CEAP clinical score, VCSS, and VDS demonstrated a linear association with CEAP clinical class (P <.001, P <.001, P =.002, respectively). Good correlation among all severity scores was found, particularly between CEAP clinical score and VCSS (r = 0.94; P <.001). CEAP clinical score was also highly correlated with CEAP clinical class (r = 0.84; P <.001) and VDS (r = 0.70; P <.001). Similarly, VCSS correlated with CEAP clinical class (r = 0.83; P <.001) and also VDS (r = 0.72; P <.001). The anatomic severity marker VSDS demonstrated a weak correlation with clinical severity indicators VCSS (r = 0.29; P =.048) and VDS (r = 0.31; P =.03) but not with age, gender, or CEAP clinical class and score. Six months after surgery the median (interquartile range) percent change in VCSS (73%; range, 50%-100%) and CEAP clinical score (70%; range, 50%-100%) were both significantly greater (P <.001) than the corresponding change in CEAP clinical class (17%; range, 0%-50%). In legs with high VDS at baseline, median (interquartile range) percent change in VDS was 100% (range, 50%-100%), significantly greater (P <.001) than the corresponding change in CEAP clinical class (0%; range, 0%-17%).
CONCLUSIONS: Venous severity scores are significantly higher in advanced venous disease, demonstrating correlation with anatomic extent. Both venous clinical severity scores, VCSS and CEAP clinical score, are equally sensitive and significantly better for measuring changes in response to superficial venous surgery than is the already in use CEAP clinical class. VDS demonstrated comparable and even better performance. Although the assignment of CEAP clinical class might be adequate for daily clinical purposes, venous severity scoring systems should be used in clinical studies to quantify venous outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12891101     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00323-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  10 in total

1.  Use of a Novel Device in Reconstructive Venous Surgery: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Daniele Camilli; Alessandro Platone; Massimo Ruggeri; Sergio Furgiuele
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-09-20

2.  Management of Varicose Veins and Chronic Venous Insufficiency in a Comparative Registry with Nine Venoactive Products in Comparison with Stockings.

Authors:  G Belcaro; M Dugall; R Luzzi; M Corsi; A Ledda; A Ricci; L Pellegrini; M R Cesarone; M Hosoi; B M Errichi; U Cornelli; R Cotellese; G Agus; B Feragalli
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2016-12-28

Review 3.  [Etiology, nomenclature and pathophysiology of chronic venous insufficiency].

Authors:  W Salmhofer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-06-14

4.  Use of a Novel Two-layer Bandage in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Hypertension.

Authors:  Eric J Lullove; Elizabeth Newton
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2014-06-04

5.  Pain Outcomes Following Mechanochemical Ablation vs Cyanoacrylate Adhesive for the Treatment of Primary Truncal Saphenous Vein Incompetence: The MOCCA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amjad Belramman; Roshan Bootun; Tjun Yip Tang; Tristan R A Lane; Alun H Davies
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 16.681

6.  Endovascular laser therapy for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-04-01

7.  Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2011-02-01

8.  A Clinical Comparison of Pycnogenol, Antistax, and Stocking in Chronic Venous Insufficiency.

Authors:  Gianni Belcaro
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-07-15

9.  Correlation of Venous Clinical Severity Score and Venous Disability Score with Dermatology Life Quality Index in Chronic Venous Insufficiency.

Authors:  Subhadeep Mallick; Tanusree Sarkar; Tirthankar Gayen; Biswanath Naskar; Adrija Datta; Somenath Sarkar
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  LivRelief varicose veins cream in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency of the lower limbs: A 6-week single arm pilot study.

Authors:  Heather C Dwyer; David C Baranowski; Perry V Mayer; Simona Gabriele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.