Literature DB >> 12890455

Clinical decision guidelines for NHS cosmetic surgery: analysis of current limitations and recommendations for future development.

S A Cook1, R Rosser, S Meah, M I James, P Salmon.   

Abstract

Because of increasing demand for publicly funded elective cosmetic surgery, clinical decision guidelines have been developed to select those patients who should receive it. The aims of this study were to identify: the main characteristics of such guidelines; whether and how they influence clinical decision making; and ways in which they should be improved. UK health authorities were asked for their current guidelines for elective cosmetic surgery and, in a single plastic surgery unit, we examined the impact of its guidelines by observing consultations and interviewing surgeons and managers. Of 115 authorities approached, 32 reported using guidelines and provided sufficient information for analysis. Guidelines mostly concerned arbitrary sets of cosmetic procedures and lacked reference to an evidence base. They allowed surgery for specified anatomical, functional or symptomatic reasons, but these indications varied between guidelines. Most guidelines also permitted surgery 'exceptionally' for psychological reasons. The guidelines that were studied in detail did not appreciably influence surgeons' decisions, which reflected criteria that were not cited in the guidelines, including cost of the procedure and whether patients sought restoration or improvement of their appearance. Decision guidelines in this area have several limitations. Future guidelines should: include all cosmetic procedures; be informed by a broad range of evidence; and, arguably, include several nonclinical criteria that currently inform surgeons' decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12890455     DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00183-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  4 in total

Review 1.  Requests for cosmetic genitoplasty: how should healthcare providers respond?

Authors:  Lih Mei Liao; Sarah M Creighton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-05-26

2.  When Aesthetics, Surgery, and Psychology Meet: Aesthetic Nasal Proportions in Patients Having Rhinoplasty and Normal Adults.

Authors:  Mohsen Naraghi; Mohammad Atari; Hossein Asadollahi
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-24

3.  Assessing the effects of changes in care commissioning guidelines at a tertiary centre in London on the provision of NHS-funded procedures of limited clinical effectiveness: an 11-year retrospective database analysis.

Authors:  Shafiq Rahman; Benjamin Langridge; Nadine Hachach-Haram; Esther Hansen; Anna Bootle; Nicola Bystrzonowski; Stephen Hamilton; Afshin Mosahebi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  An ethics analysis of the rationale for publicly funded plastic surgery.

Authors:  Lars Sandman; Emma Hansson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.