Literature DB >> 12890081

Ethical issues in end-of-life geriatric care: the approach of three monotheistic religions-Judaism, Catholicism, and Islam.

A Mark Clarfield1, Michael Gordon, Hazel Markwell, Shabbir M H Alibhai.   

Abstract

Ethical dilemmas pervade modern geriatric medicine. What is considered right or wrong will differ depending on, among other things, the patient's religion. The three Abrahamic monotheistic religions, Judaism, Christianity (its Catholic variant), and Islam all have carefully considered positions on medical ethics. Although much is held in common, there are significant differences. The authors present three clinical cases, each of which presents ethical dilemmas typical of geriatric care, especially at the end of life. On the basis of these scenarios, the normative ethical position of each religion is compared and contrasted. It is hoped that this approach will offer the geriatrician a useful approach to treating patients in an increasingly multicultural society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Religious Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12890081     DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51364.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  13 in total

1.  To die, to sleep: US physicians' religious and other objections to physician-assisted suicide, terminal sedation, and withdrawal of life support.

Authors:  Farr A Curlin; Chinyere Nwodim; Jennifer L Vance; Marshall H Chin; John D Lantos
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  [Trans-cultural geriatrics: an incipient challenge].

Authors:  Alexander Lapin
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

3.  Health and Religions: A Bibliometric Analysis of Health Literature Related to Abrahamic Religions Between 1975 and 2017.

Authors:  Engin Şenel
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2018-10

4.  The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study.

Authors:  F D Ganz; J Benbenishty; M Hersch; A Fischer; G Gurman; C L Sprung
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Ethical Considerations Concerning Use of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Feeding Tubes in Patients With Advanced Dementia.

Authors:  Paul L Schneider; Cynthia Fruchtman; Joe Indenbaum; Eszter Neuman; Christine Wilson; Terri Keville
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 6.  Factors that predict outcome of intensive care treatment in very elderly patients: a review.

Authors:  Sophia E de Rooij; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Marcel Levi; Evert de Jonge
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Beyond cultural stereotyping: views on end-of-life decision making among religious and secular persons in the USA, Germany, and Israel.

Authors:  Mark Schweda; Silke Schicktanz; Aviad Raz; Anita Silvers
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Progress in palliative care in Israel: comparative mapping and next steps.

Authors:  Netta Bentur; Linda L Emanuel; Nathan Cherney
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2012-02-20

9.  Doctors' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Enteral Feeding and Eating Problems in Advanced Dementia.

Authors:  Boris Punchik; Elena Komissarov; Vladimir Zeldez; Tamar Freud; Tali Samson; Yan Press
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2018-07-20

10.  Israel Ad Hoc COVID-19 Committee: Guidelines for Care of Older Persons During a Pandemic.

Authors:  A Mark Clarfield; Tzvi Dwolatzky; Shai Brill; Yan Press; Shimon Glick; Pesach Shvartzman; Israel Issi Doron
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.