OBJECTIVES: To determine whether calf circumference (CC), related to appendicular skeletal muscle mass, can be used as a measure of sarcopenia and is related to physical function. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from 1992 to 1994 of the European Patient Information and Documentation Systems Study. SETTING: Community setting in France. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand four hundred fifty-eight French women aged 70 and older without previous history of hip fracture were recruited from the electoral lists. MEASUREMENTS: Muscular mass was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). CC was measured using a tape measure. Anthropometric measurements (height; weight; and waist, hip, and calf circumference), strength markers (grip strength), and self-reported physical function were also determined. Sarcopenia was defined (using DEXA) as appendicular skeletal muscle mass (weight (kg)/height (m2)) less than two standard deviations below the mean of a young female reference group. RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 9.5%. CC was correlated with appendicular skeletal muscle mass (r = 0.63). CC under 31 cm was the best clinical indicator of sarcopenia (sensitivity = 44.3%, specificity = 91.4%). CC under 31 cm was associated with disability and self-reported physical function but not sarcopenia (defined using DEXA), independent of age, comorbidity, obesity, income, health behavior, and visual impairment. CONCLUSION: CC cannot be used to predict sarcopenia defined using DEXA but provides valuable information on muscle-related disability and physical function.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether calf circumference (CC), related to appendicular skeletal muscle mass, can be used as a measure of sarcopenia and is related to physical function. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from 1992 to 1994 of the European Patient Information and Documentation Systems Study. SETTING: Community setting in France. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand four hundred fifty-eight French women aged 70 and older without previous history of hip fracture were recruited from the electoral lists. MEASUREMENTS: Muscular mass was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). CC was measured using a tape measure. Anthropometric measurements (height; weight; and waist, hip, and calf circumference), strength markers (grip strength), and self-reported physical function were also determined. Sarcopenia was defined (using DEXA) as appendicular skeletal muscle mass (weight (kg)/height (m2)) less than two standard deviations below the mean of a young female reference group. RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 9.5%. CC was correlated with appendicular skeletal muscle mass (r = 0.63). CC under 31 cm was the best clinical indicator of sarcopenia (sensitivity = 44.3%, specificity = 91.4%). CC under 31 cm was associated with disability and self-reported physical function but not sarcopenia (defined using DEXA), independent of age, comorbidity, obesity, income, health behavior, and visual impairment. CONCLUSION: CC cannot be used to predict sarcopenia defined using DEXA but provides valuable information on muscle-related disability and physical function.
Authors: V E Arango-Lopera; P Arroyo; L M Gutiérrez-Robledo; M U Pérez-Zepeda; M Cesari Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: L M Donini; E Poggiogalle; A Morrone; P Scardella; L Piombo; B Neri; E Cava; D Cucinotta; M Barbagallo; A Pinto Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: A Mithal; J-P Bonjour; S Boonen; P Burckhardt; H Degens; G El Hajj Fuleihan; R Josse; P Lips; J Morales Torres; R Rizzoli; N Yoshimura; D A Wahl; C Cooper; B Dawson-Hughes Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 4.507