Literature DB >> 12889845

Impact of the joint space width measurement method on the design of knee osteoarthritis studies.

Olivier Bruyère1, Yves E Henrotin, Aline Honoré, Lucio C Rovati, Laurence Seidel, Charles Dardenne, Jean-Yves L Reginster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent guidelines recommend measurement of articular loss over several years, determined by conventional X-rays, as the principal outcome measure in clinical trials of potential structure-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the joint space width measurement method on sample size calculation in knee OA studies.
METHODS: Standard knee X-rays were taken in 212 patients with knee OA at baseline and after 3 years of follow-up. Mean joint space width (JSW) was measured with an in-house computer-assisted method. Minimum JSW, measured with a graduated magnifying lens, was taken as external standard. After calculation of the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the JSW, sensitivity to change was assessed using the standardized response mean (SRM). The number of patients needed to identify a mean significant difference of 0.5 mm in joint space narrowing between the placebo and the treated group, after 3 years of follow-up, was then calculated.
RESULTS: JSW measured with the computer-assisted technique showed better intra- and inter-observer reproducibility than when using the magnifying lens. JSW values measured with our computer-assisted method were significantly correlated with JSW values obtained using the magnifying lens (r=0.87, p<0.001). The SRM were 0.44 and 0.40 for the computer-assisted method and magnifying lens, respectively. The number of patients needed was 131 per group using the computer-assisted method, and 104 using the magnifying lens.
CONCLUSIONS: Our method of measurement of JSW may be of potential use in longitudinal studies evaluating the effect of structure-modifying drugs in OA, due to its high level of precision and efficiency. However, although sensitivity to change is markedly better with the digitized method compared with the graduated magnifying lens, we recommend the measurement of mean and minimum JSW in structure-modifying OA trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12889845     DOI: 10.1007/bf03324491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  3 in total

1.  Semi-automated digital image analysis of joint space width in knee radiographs.

Authors:  J E Schmidt; K K Amrami; A Manduca; K R Kaufman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Diffraction enhanced imaging of articular cartilage and comparison with micro-computed tomography of the underlying bone structure.

Authors:  Sharmila Majumdar; Ahi Sema Issever; Andrew Burghardt; Jeffrey Lotz; Fulvia Arfelli; Luigi Rigon; Gabriele Heitner; Ralf-Hendrik Menk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of 2 Radiographic Techniques for Measurement of Tibiofemoral Joint Space Width.

Authors:  Nabil Mehta; Jeffrey Duryea; Gary J Badger; Matthew R Akelman; Morgan H Jones; Kurt P Spindler; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.