OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the specialist seating clinic's effectiveness in improving skin management knowledge and independence, represented by the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC). DESIGN: Longitudinal, between subjects design, with two intervention groups and one control. SETTING: Tertiary care, spinal cord injury centre (National Spinal Injuries Centre), Stoke Mandeville Hospital, United Kingdom. METHOD: This study assessed the skin management ability of three groups. Group 1 consisted of individuals who had attended a specialist seating assessment (SSA) clinic before their first needs assessment, group 2 had attended SSA between their first and second needs assessment, and group 3 (control) had not attended at all. Patient skin management ability was assessed using the skin management subscale of the NAC, a measure of rehabilitation outcome, at two time points. RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between group 3 and group 1 at both the first (t = 2.36, degrees of freedom (df) = 37, p < 0.05) and second (t = 2.84, df = 37, p < 0.01) needs assessment. Significant improvements were also observed within each group between the first and second needs assessment time points in all seating assessment categories. CONCLUSION: Skin management achievement scores were significantly higher for patients who had attended a SSA clinic before their first NAC (group 1) at both time points, supporting the use of SSA as a proactive intervention to improve patient independence, knowledge and awareness, and potentially reduce pressure ulcer incidence.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the specialist seating clinic's effectiveness in improving skin management knowledge and independence, represented by the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC). DESIGN: Longitudinal, between subjects design, with two intervention groups and one control. SETTING: Tertiary care, spinal cord injury centre (National Spinal Injuries Centre), Stoke Mandeville Hospital, United Kingdom. METHOD: This study assessed the skin management ability of three groups. Group 1 consisted of individuals who had attended a specialist seating assessment (SSA) clinic before their first needs assessment, group 2 had attended SSA between their first and second needs assessment, and group 3 (control) had not attended at all. Patient skin management ability was assessed using the skin management subscale of the NAC, a measure of rehabilitation outcome, at two time points. RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between group 3 and group 1 at both the first (t = 2.36, degrees of freedom (df) = 37, p < 0.05) and second (t = 2.84, df = 37, p < 0.01) needs assessment. Significant improvements were also observed within each group between the first and second needs assessment time points in all seating assessment categories. CONCLUSION: Skin management achievement scores were significantly higher for patients who had attended a SSA clinic before their first NAC (group 1) at both time points, supporting the use of SSA as a proactive intervention to improve patient independence, knowledge and awareness, and potentially reduce pressure ulcer incidence.
Authors: Mary Ann Regan; Robert W Teasell; Dalton L Wolfe; David Keast; William B Mortenson; Jo-Anne L Aubut Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.966