Literature DB >> 12888639

Short-term continuous enteral tube feeding schedules did not suppress appetite and food intake in healthy men in a placebo-controlled trial.

Rebecca J Stratton1, R James Stubbs, Marinos Elia.   

Abstract

Tube feeding (TF) provides a model with which to study appetite when nutrient delivery bypasses the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract and associated cephalic phase response. Nocturnal, diurnal and 24-h TF schedules are used clinically, but their effects on satiety have not been distinguished. This study tested two hypotheses: 1) bypassing the upper GI tract with TF has little satiating effect, and 2) diurnal TF suppresses appetite and food intake more than nocturnal or 24-h schedules. Six healthy men, residing in a metabolic suite, each received three continuous TF schedules (diurnal 12-h, nocturnal 12-h and 24-h; 6.86 +/- 0.51 MJ/d) in random order for 3 d over separate 10-d periods. Two days before and after TF, a placebo feed (<0.4 MJ/d) was given. Weighed measurements of ad libitum food consumption, hourly tracking of appetite and metabolic and hormonal measurements were undertaken. Compared with placebo feeding, there was a nonsignificant reduction in oral intake (1.01-2.49 MJ reduction), little change in appetite sensations with TF and an increase in total energy intake from 14.88 to 20.42 +/- 3.25 MJ. The schedules did not differ although diurnal TF was the most satiating. Changes in a variety of mediators (including leptin, insulin, cholecystokinin, metabolites and respiratory quotient) did not relate to immediate assessments of appetite and food intake. This trial suggests that continuous TF has little effect on satiety in healthy men over a period of 3 d, irrespective of the timing of the schedule. This could not be explained by changes in a variety of metabolic and hormonal signals within the time frame studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12888639     DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.8.2570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  9 in total

1.  Continuous enteral and parenteral feeding each reduces heart rate variability but differentially influences monocyte gene expression in humans.

Authors:  Stephen C Gale; Beth-Ann Shanker; Susette M Coyle; Marie A Macor; Chun W Choi; Steve E Calvano; Siobhan A Corbett; Stephen F Lowry
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Making sense of the sensory regulation of hunger neurons.

Authors:  Yiming Chen; Zachary A Knight
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Impact of nutrient density of nocturnal enteral feeds on appetite: a prospective, randomised crossover study.

Authors:  S Evans; A Daly; A MacDonald; P Davies; I W Booth
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Weaning children from prolonged enteral nutrition: A position paper.

Authors:  Haude Clouzeau; Valeria Dipasquale; Laila Rivard; Katia Lecoeur; Audrey Lecoufle; Valérie Le Ru-Raguénès; Dominique Guimber; Véronique Leblanc; Gaelle Malécot-Le Meur; Sophie Baeckeroot; Audrey Van Malleghem; Irène Loras-Duclaux; Amandine Rubio; Aline Genevois-Peres; Sophie Dubedout; Mélanie Bué-Chevalier; Marc Bellaïche; Véronique Abadie; Frédéric Gottrand
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Presence and persistence of nutrition-related symptoms during the first year following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction in clinically disease-free patients.

Authors:  E B Haverkort; J M Binnekade; O R C Busch; M I van Berge Henegouwen; R J de Haan; D J Gouma
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Continuous versus bolus tube feeds: Does the modality affect glycemic variability, tube feeding volume, caloric intake, or insulin utilization?

Authors:  David C Evans; Rachel Forbes; Christian Jones; Robert Cotterman; Chinedu Njoku; Cattleya Thongrong; David Tulman; Sergio D Bergese; Sheela Thomas; Thomas J Papadimos; Stanislaw P Stawicki
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

7.  The Effects of a Normal Rate versus a Slow Intervalled Rate of Oral Nutrient Intake and Intravenous Low Rate Macronutrient Application on Psychophysical Function - Two Pilot Studies.

Authors:  Melanie Y Denzer-Lippmann; Stephan Bachlechner; Jan Wielopolski; Marie Fischer; Andrea Buettner; Arndt Doerfler; Christof Schöfl; Gerald Münch; Johannes Kornhuber; Norbert Thürauf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-28

8.  Appetite Assessment of Hospitalized Cancer Patients in Brazil - A Validation Study.

Authors:  Gislaine Aparecida Ozório; Maria Manuela Ferreira Alves de Almeida; Sheilla de Oliveira Faria; Thais de Campos Cardenas; Dan Linetzky Waitzberg
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Intermittent versus continuous enteral nutrition attenuates increases in insulin and leptin during short-term bed rest.

Authors:  Javier T Gonzalez; Marlou L Dirks; Andrew M Holwerda; Imre W K Kouw; Luc J C van Loon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.078

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.