Literature DB >> 1288794

Bone physiology and metabolism in dental implantology: risk factors for osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases.

W E Roberts1, K E Simmons, L P Garetto, R A DeCastro.   

Abstract

Placing a dental implant elicits a time-dependent bone response controlled by wound-healing factors (cytokines, bioelectrical signals), biomechanics (gravitational, functional, and therapeutic loads), and mineral metabolism (hormones, diet, excretion). The osseous response to an implant involves four physiological stages: (1) endosteal and periosteal callus formation; (2) compaction and remodeling of the callus; (3) remodeling (turnover) of the nonvital interface and adjacent bone; and (4) maturation (secondary mineralization) of new bone. Long-term maintenance of a rigid implant interface is related to continual bone remodeling. Common metabolic bone disorders affecting potential implant patients are osteopenia ("osteoporosis"), renal osteodystrophy, osteomalacia, and Paget's disease. The most prevalent problem is a long-term negative calcium balance leading to a compromise in bone strength. Symptomatic osteoporosis (usually wrist, hip, and/or spine fractures) affects 4 to 50 percent of the population depending on age, race, sex, endocrine status, and life-style. Postmenopausal white and Asian females present the greatest risk. The jaws of "osteoporotic" adults are variably affected because of the moderating influence of mechanical function. Management of metabolic bone disorders is an important consideration in diagnosis, treatment planning, and long-term monitoring of dental implants. Bone metabolic counseling, a natural extension of preventative dentistry, is an unexpected benefit readily appreciated by patients and their families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1288794     DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199200110-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  5 in total

Review 1.  Significance of osteoporosis in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; R Schmelzeisen; B M Pfeiffer; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants.

Authors:  Sompop Bencharit; Warren C Byrd; Sandra Altarawneh; Bashir Hosseini; Austin Leong; Glenn Reside; Thiago Morelli; Steven Offenbacher
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 3.  Bone grafting materials in dentoalveolar reconstruction: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  S Titsinides; G Agrogiannis; T Karatzas
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

Review 4.  Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Pandey; Dinesh Rokaya; Bishwa Prakash Bhattarai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 5.  Current trends to measure implant stability.

Authors:  Vasanthi Swami; Vasantha Vijayaraghavan; Vinit Swami
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.