Literature DB >> 12887719

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis: an overview.

Rolf Bambauer1, Ralf Schiel, Reinhard Latza.   

Abstract

Atherosclerosis with myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral cellular disease still maintains its position at the top of morbidity and mortality statistics in industrialized nations. Established risk factors widely accepted are smoking, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and central obesity. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lpa) levels, and coronary heart disease (CHD) refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs is poor. For such patients, regular treatment with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the therapeutic option. Today, there are four different LDL apheresis systems available: immunoadsorption, heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL/fibrinogen precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL adsorption and LDL hemoperfusion. Regarding the different LDL apheresis systems used, there is no significant difference with respect to the clinical outcome or concerning total cholesterol, LDL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or triglyceride concentrations. With respect to elevated Lpa levels, however, the immunoadsorption method seems to be the most effective. In 45 patients (25 women, 20 men) suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to diet and lipid lowering drugs, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis was performed over 95.6 +/- 44.7 months. Four different systems (Liposorber, 32 of 45, Kaneka, Osaka, Japan; Therasorb, 6 of 45, Baxter, Munich, Germany; Lipopak, 2 of 45, Pocard, Moscow, Russia; and Dali, 5 of 45, Fresenius, St. Wendel, Germany) were used. With all methods, average reductions of 57% for total cholesterol, 55.9% for LDL, 75.8% for lipoprotein a (Lpa), and 45.9% for triglycerides, and an average increase of 14.3% for HDL were reached. Severe side-effects such as shock or allergic reactions were very rare (0.3%) in all methods. In the course of treatment, an improvement in general well-being and increased performance were experienced by 44 of 45 patients. The present data demonstrate that treatment with LDL apheresis of patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to maximum conservative therapy is very effective and safe even in long-term application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12887719     DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2003.00070.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Apher Dial        ISSN: 1744-9979            Impact factor:   1.762


  12 in total

1.  Low-density lipoprotein apheresis reduces platelet factor 4 on the surface of platelets: a possible protective mechanism against heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis.

Authors:  Yvette C Tanhehco; Ann H Rux; Bruce S Sachais
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Lipoprotein-apheresis: Austrian consensus on indication and performance of treatment.

Authors:  Kurt Derfler; Sabine Steiner; Helmut Sinzinger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Preparation of sulfonated porous carbon nanotubes/activated carbon composite beads and their adsorption of low density lipoprotein.

Authors:  Yuemei Lu; Qianming Gong; Fangping Lu; Ji Liang; Lijun Ji; Qingdong Nie; Xiumei Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Low-density lipoprotein apheresis: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01

Review 5.  LDL-apheresis: technical and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Rolf Bambauer; Carolin Bambauer; Boris Lehmann; Reinhard Latza; Ralf Schiel
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-30

Review 6.  Soy and phytoestrogens: possible side effects.

Authors:  Sergei V Jargin
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 7.  Hormesis and homeopathy: The artificial twins.

Authors:  Sergei V Jargin
Journal:  J Intercult Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2014-11-28

8.  Prospective multicentre study of the effect of voluntary plasmapheresis on plasma cholesterol levels in donors.

Authors:  M Rosa-Bray; C Wisdom; S Wada; B R Johnson; V Grifols-Roura; V Grifols-Lucas
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 9.  Systematic Review of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Apheresis for the Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Anthony Wang; Akshara Richhariya; Shravanthi R Gandra; Brian Calimlim; Lisa Kim; Ruben G W Quek; Robert J Nordyke; Peter P Toth
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  The Removal of HBV in Plasma by Extracorporeal Immunoadsorption from Plasma: A Potential Therapy of Hepatitis B Patients.

Authors:  Zhenwei Han; Xuan Lu; Yiping Tang; Yuanyuan Yang; Qiuchen Liu; Pengfei Cheng; Li Zhou; Yefu Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.