Literature DB >> 12887381

Rheological properties and biocompatibility of endodontic sealers.

A E Kaplan1, M F Ormaechea, M Picca, M C Canzobre, A M Ubios.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the flow characteristics and subcutaneous tissue reactions to five endodontic sealers.
METHODOLOGY: The materials used were Procosol, AH26, Endomethasone, Sealapex and Endion. The sealers were prepared following the manufacturers' instructions, and 0.075 mL of each material was placed on a glass surface, which was then rotated 90 degrees. The samples were stored at 37 degrees C and 95% humidity. The displacement of the sealer was recorded by measuring the difference between its original position and the position recorded at 15 and 60 min. Three samples of each material were used. Two pockets were created in the back of Wistar rats, and one silicone tube, 1 mm in diameter and 1 cm in length, was implanted in each. One was filled with one of the materials under study, and the other empty tube was implanted as a control. Fourteen days after implantation, the animals were sacrificed, and samples of the skin containing the tubes were histologically processed. Histological and histomorphometric evaluations of the tissues adjacent to the open end of the tube were carried out the volume of tissue reaction was measured histomorphometrically according to standard stereological principles. Results were statistically analysed using analysis of variance and Duncan's test.
RESULTS: The highest flow values were obtained with Sealapex and AH26. Time significantly affected the flow and the material (P < (1001). Procosol and Endion produced the most severe histological reactions: these were outlined by fibrous tissue; AH26. Endomethasone and Sealapex produced reactions of smaller size and with more moderately defined limits.
CONCLUSIONS: The flow did not correlate with the degree of inflammatory response. Procosol and Endion produced the most severe tissue reactions, whereas Endomethasone, Sealapex and AH26 produced only minimum reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12887381     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00683.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  10 in total

1.  Investigating unset endodontic sealers' eugenol and hydrocortisone roles in modulating the initial steps of inflammation.

Authors:  Charlotte Jeanneau; Thomas Giraud; Jean-Louis Milan; Imad About
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A comparison of viscoelastic properties of three root canal sealers.

Authors:  Sedigheh Khedmat; Fatemeh Momen-Heravi; Malihe Pishvaei
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31

3.  Comparing subcutaneous tissue responses to freshly mixed and set root canal sealers.

Authors:  Setareh Derakhshan; Alireza Adl; Masoud Parirokh; Fatemeh Mashadiabbas; Ali Akbar Haghdoost
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2009-10-10

4.  Biocompatibility of a new epoxy resin-based root canal sealer in subcutaneous tissue of rat.

Authors:  Neslihan Simsek; Levent Akinci; Orhan Gecor; Hilal Alan; Fuat Ahmetoglu; Elif Taslidere
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

5.  Biocompatibility of RealSeal, its primer and AH Plus implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats.

Authors:  Fabiana Soares Grecca; Patrícia Maria Poli Kopper; Régis Burmeister dos Santos; Anna Christina Fossati; Vinicius Coelho Carrard; Gerson Arison Xavier Acasigua; José Antônio Poli de Figueiredo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Subcutaneous tissue reaction to castor oil bean and calcium hydroxide in rats.

Authors:  Samira Esteves Afonso Camargo; Sigmar de Mello Rode; Renata Falchete do Prado; Yasmin Rodarte Carvalho; Carlos Henrique Ribeiro Camargo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to a New Nano Zinc-Oxide Eugenol Sealer in Rat Model.

Authors:  Salma Omidi; Maryam Javidi; Mina Zarei; Siavash Mushakhian; Amirhossein Jafarian
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017

8.  Comparison of the penetration depth of five root canal sealers: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study.

Authors:  Priyanka Mokashi; Jinal Shah; Padmini Chandrasekhar; Gaurav Prakash Kulkarni; Rajesh Podar; Shishir Singh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2021-10-09

9.  Comparison of the rheological properties of four root canal sealers.

Authors:  Seok Woo Chang; Young-Kyu Lee; Qiang Zhu; Won Jun Shon; Woo Cheol Lee; Kee Yeon Kum; Seung Ho Baek; In Bog Lee; Bum-Soon Lim; Kwang Shik Bae
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.344

10.  Physical properties and biocompatibility of an injectable calcium-silicate-based root canal sealer: in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  Eun-Su Lim; Young-Bae Park; Young-Sun Kwon; Won-Jun Shon; Kwang-Won Lee; Kyung-San Min
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.757

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.