Literature DB >> 12887364

Morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: summary of early multi-institutional experience in Japan.

Yoichi Arai1, Shin Egawa, Toshiro Terachi, Kazuo Suzuki, Momokazu Gotoh, Mutsushi Kawakita, Masatoshi Tanaka, Naoki Terada, Shiro Baba, Kazuhiro Okumura, Shinsuke Hayami, Yoshinari Ono, Tadashi Matsuda, Seiji Naito.   

Abstract

AIM: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is being evaluated throughout the world. The aim of the present study is to report early multi-institutional experience of the procedure in Japan.
METHODS: A total of 148 men who were diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at seven different institutions in Japan. Early complications (within 30 days postoperatively) and postoperative convalescence were reviewed retrospectively. The median age of patients was 68.0 years (range, 51-80).
RESULTS: The median operative time was 403 minutes (range, 167-925; average, 427). Blood loss ranged from 50 to 5000 mL (median, 540; average, 856). A total of 66 complications were reported in 55 patients (37.2%). Intraoperative complications were noted in 25 of 148 patients (16.9%): 10 rectal injuries (6.8%); five bladder injuries (3.4%); five cases of subcutaneous emphysema (3.4%); two intestinal injuries (1.4%); one major vessel injury (0.7%); one ureteral injury (0.7%); and one obturator nerve injury (0.7%). Overall, 16 of 148 patients (10.8%) required open conversion or postoperative open surgical repair. The most common postoperative complications were anastomotic leakage (6.8%), wound-related complications (4.7%) and perineal pain (4.7%). The bladder catheter was removed on day 7 or earlier in 73 cases (49.3%). The median time to ambulation was 1 day (mean 1.4, range 1-5). Oral intake was started on postoperative day 1 in 67 patients (45.2%) and on postoperative day 2 in 65 (43.9%).
CONCLUSION: Although laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is technically demanding, reduced blood loss and shorter convalescence periods can be expected from the procedure. Surgeons should be aware of the disturbingly high morbidity rate related to early experience. By mastering laparoscopic skills and sharing knowledge, surgeons could reduce the impact of the learning curve required to complete this procedure competently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12887364     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003.00658.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  4 in total

Review 1.  Categorisation of complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Benjamin Lee; Michael C Truss; Hartwig Schwaibold; Martin Burchardt; Udo Jonas; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Prevention and management of perioperative complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Evangelos Liatsikos; Robert Rabenalt; Martin Burchardt; Miguel-Ramirez Backhaus; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Johanna Wasserscheid; Costantinos Constantinides; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Michael C Truss; Thomas R Herrmann; Roman Ganzer; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Rectal tube or no rectal tube? A viewpoint from Duke University Medical Center.

Authors:  Sean A Pierre; David M Albala
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-05-06

4.  Approach to endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): the impact of previous laparoscopic experience on the learning curve.

Authors:  Andreas Blana; Markus Straub; Peter J Wild; Jens C Lunz; Thorsten Bach; Wolf F Wieland; Roman Ganzer
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.