Literature DB >> 12886518

Possibility of re-screening intervals of more than one year in men with PSA levels of 4.0 ng/ml or less.

Kazuto Ito1, Takumi Yamamoto, Masaru Ohi, Hiroyuki Takechi, Kohei Kurokawa, Kazuhiro Suzuki, Hidetoshi Yamanaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal re-screening interval is one of the most important issues to evaluate the effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer.
METHODS: Between 1992 and 2000, 7,026 men aged 50-78 with baseline PSA levels of 4.0 ng/ml or lower underwent screening for prostate cancer twice or more. The risk of developing prostate cancer relative to elapsed years and baseline PSA levels were investigated.
RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in a total of 127 cases (1.8%). The detection rate of prostate cancer was high between 1.6% and 5.5% at 1 year after baseline PSA measurements in men with baseline PSA levels of 2.1-4.0 ng/ml. In men with baseline PSA levels of 1.1- 2.0 ng/ml, the detection rate increased from 0.06% to 1.02% with passed years. The proportion of stage >/=T3 was high at 63% in prostate cancer cases detected between 3 and 4 years after baseline PSA levels being 1.1-2.0 ng/ml. In men with baseline PSA levels of 1.0 or lower, the cumulative detection rate of prostate cancer was low at 0.01% within 3 years, however, the detection rate increased to 0.34% after 5 or more years from baseline PSA measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The re-screening interval was recommended to be 1, 1-2, and 3-5 years for men with baseline PSA levels of 2.1-4.0 ng/ml, 1.1-2.0 ng/ml, and 1.0 ng/ml or lower, respectively. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12886518     DOI: 10.1002/pros.10268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  5 in total

1.  Individualized screening interval for prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen level: results of a prospective, randomized, population-based study.

Authors:  Gunnar Aus; Jan-Erik Damber; Ali Khatami; Hans Lilja; Johan Stranne; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-12

2.  [Mass screening guidelines for prostate cancer: Should they be utilized in France?].

Authors:  Maxime Gignon; Alain Braillon; François-Xavier Chaine; Gérard Dubois
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 May-Jun

3.  [Referral criteria for benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care].

Authors:  José María Molero; David Pérez Morales; Francisco José Brenes Bermúdez; Esperanza Naval Pulido; Antonio Fernández-Pro; Juan Antonio Martín; Jesús Castiñeiras Fernández; José Manuel Cozar Olmo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Differences in tumor-associated protein levels among middle-age Flemish women in association with area of residence and exposure to pollutants.

Authors:  Nicolas A van Larebeke; Marc E Bracke; Vera Nelen; Gudrun Koppen; Greet Schoeters; Herman Van Loon; Robert Vlietinck
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Prostate-specific antigen-based population screening for prostate cancer: current status in Japan and future perspective in Asia.

Authors:  Yasuhide Kitagawa; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.