Literature DB >> 12886128

Improved radiologic staging of lung cancer with 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography registration.

Suzanne L Aquino1, Jane C Asmuth, Nathaniel M Alpert, Elkan F Halpern, Alan J Fischman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if volumetric nonlinear registration or registration of thoracic computed tomography (CT) and 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) datasets changes the detection of mediastinal and hilar nodal disease in patients undergoing staging for lung cancer and if it has any impact on radiologic lung cancer staging.
METHOD: Computer-based image registration was performed on 45 clinical thoracic helical CT and FDG-PET scans of patients with lung cancer who were staged by mediastinoscopy and/or thoracotomy. Thoracic CT, FDG-PET, and registration datasets were each interpreted by 2 readers for the presence of metastatic nodal disease and were staged independently of each other. Results were compared with surgical pathologic findings.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty lymph node stations in the mediastinum and hila were evaluated each on CT, PET, and registration datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively, for detecting metastatic nodal disease for CT were 74%, 78%, 55%, 88%; for PET with CT side by side, 59% to 76%, 77% to 89%, 48% to 68%, and 84% to 91%; and for CT-PET registration, 71% to 76%, 89% to 96%, 70% to 86%, and 90% to 91%. Registration images were significantly more sensitive in detecting nodal disease over PET for 1 reader (P = 0.0156) and were more specific than PET (P = 0.0107 and 0.0017) in identifying the absence of mediastinal disease for both readers. Registration was significantly more accurate for staging when compared with PET for both readers (P = 0.002 and 0.035).
CONCLUSION: Registration of CT and FDG-PET datasets significantly improved the specificity of detecting metastatic disease. In addition, registration improved the radiologic staging of lung cancer patients when compared with CT or FDG-PET alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12886128     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200307000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  8 in total

1.  [Combined Scanners (PET/CT, SPECT/CT) Versus Multimodality Imaging with Separated Systems].

Authors:  T Pfluger; C la Fougère; J Stauss; R Santos; C Vollmar; K Hahn
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Additional value of PET-CT in the staging of lung cancer: comparison with CT alone, PET alone and visual correlation of PET and CT.

Authors:  W De Wever; S Ceyssens; L Mortelmans; S Stroobants; G Marchal; J Bogaert; J A Verschakelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  PET-CT in the staging and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Ibeas; Blanca Cantos; José Manuel Gasent; Begoña Rodríguez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Diagnostic imaging in the preoperative management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Imai; Yoshihiro Minamiya; Hajime Saito; Satoru Motoyama; Yusuke Sato; Aki Ito; Kei Yoshino; Satoshi Kudo; Shinogu Takashima; Yasushi Kawaharada; Nobuyasu Kurihara; Kimito Orino; Jun-Ichi Ogawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Correlation between glucose transporter-1 expression and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  Katsuo Usuda; Motoyasu Sagawa; Hirokazu Aikawa; Masakatsu Ueno; Makoto Tanaka; Yuichiro Machida; Xi-Tong Zhao; Yoshimichi Ueda; Koutaro Higashi; Tsutomu Sakuma
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-08-12

Review 6.  SBRT in operable early stage lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Johannes Roesch; Nicolaus Andratschke; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08

7.  Accuracy of helical computed tomography for the identification of lymph node metastasis in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Imai; Yoshihiro Minamiya; Hajime Saito; Taku Nakagawa; Yukiko Hosono; Hiroshi Nanjo; Kasumi Tozawa; Masaji Hashimoto; Yoshihiko Kimura; Jun-ichi Ogawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography accuracy in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer: review and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Nieves Gómez León; Sofía Escalona; Beatriz Bandrés; Cristobal Belda; Daniel Callejo; Juan Antonio Blasco
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-11-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.