PURPOSE: To evaluate the response rate, survival, and toxicity of mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction, high-dose cytarabine and etoposide intensification, and further consolidation/maintenance therapies, including bone marrow transplantation, in children with relapsed, refractory, or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To evaluate response to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CDA) and etoposide (VP-16) in patients who did not respond to mitoxantrone and cytarabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed/refractory AML (n = 101) and secondary AML (n = 13) were entered. RESULTS: Mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction achieved a remission rate of 76% for relapsed/refractory patients and 77% for patients with secondary AML, with a 3% induction mortality rate. Cytarabine and etoposide intensification exceeded the acceptable toxic death rate of 10%. The response rate of 2-CDA/VP-16 was 8%. Two-year overall survival was estimated at 24% and was better than historical control data. Patients with secondary AML had similar outcomes to relapsed or refractory patients. Initial remission longer than 1 year was the most important prognostic factor for patients with primary AML (2-year survival rate, 75%), whereas for patients with primary AML, with less than 12 months of initial remission, survival was 13% and was similar to that of refractory patients (6%). CONCLUSION: Mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction is effective with reasonable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory or secondary AML. The cytarabine and etoposide intensification regimen should be abandoned because of toxicity. Patients with relapsed AML with initial remissions longer than 1 year have a relatively good prognosis.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the response rate, survival, and toxicity of mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction, high-dose cytarabine and etoposide intensification, and further consolidation/maintenance therapies, including bone marrow transplantation, in children with relapsed, refractory, or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To evaluate response to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CDA) and etoposide (VP-16) in patients who did not respond to mitoxantrone and cytarabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed/refractory AML (n = 101) and secondary AML (n = 13) were entered. RESULTS:Mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction achieved a remission rate of 76% for relapsed/refractory patients and 77% for patients with secondary AML, with a 3% induction mortality rate. Cytarabine and etoposide intensification exceeded the acceptable toxic death rate of 10%. The response rate of 2-CDA/VP-16 was 8%. Two-year overall survival was estimated at 24% and was better than historical control data. Patients with secondary AML had similar outcomes to relapsed or refractory patients. Initial remission longer than 1 year was the most important prognostic factor for patients with primary AML (2-year survival rate, 75%), whereas for patients with primary AML, with less than 12 months of initial remission, survival was 13% and was similar to that of refractory patients (6%). CONCLUSION:Mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction is effective with reasonable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory or secondary AML. The cytarabine and etoposide intensification regimen should be abandoned because of toxicity. Patients with relapsed AML with initial remissions longer than 1 year have a relatively good prognosis.
Authors: Hiroto Inaba; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Shengping Yang; Stanley Pounds; Ching-Hon Pui; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Bassem I Razzouk; Raul C Ribeiro Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Todd M Cooper; Michael J Absalon; Todd A Alonzo; Robert B Gerbing; Kasey J Leger; Betsy A Hirsch; Jessica Pollard; Bassem I Razzouk; Richard Aplenc; E Anders Kolb Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Todd M Cooper; Todd A Alonzo; Robert B Gerbing; John P Perentesis; James A Whitlock; Jeffrey W Taub; Terzah M Horton; Alan S Gamis; Soheil Meshinchi; Michael R Loken; Bassem I Razzouk Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-04-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Sima Jeha; Bassem Razzouk; Michael Rytting; Susan Rheingold; Edythe Albano; Richard Kadota; Lori Luchtman-Jones; Lisa Bomgaars; Paul Gaynon; Stewart Goldman; Kim Ritchey; Robert Arceci; Arnold Altman; Kimo Stine; Laurel Steinherz; Peter Steinherz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Richard Aplenc; Todd A Alonzo; Robert B Gerbing; Beverly J Lange; Craig A Hurwitz; Robert J Wells; Irwin Bernstein; Patrick Buckley; Kathleen Krimmel; Franklin O Smith; Eric L Sievers; Robert J Arceci Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-10 Impact factor: 44.544