Literature DB >> 12885800

Intraperitoneal radioactive phosphorus (32P) versus observation after negative second-look laparotomy for stage III ovarian carcinoma: a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Mahesh A Varia1, Frederick B Stehman, Brian N Bundy, Jo Ann Benda, Daniel L Clarke-Pearson, Ronald D Alvarez, Harry J Long.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objectives of this prospective randomized study of consolidation therapy were to evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and the morbidity of intraperitoneal (IP) chromic phosphate suspension (32P) therapy in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma who have no detectable evidence of disease at the second-look laparotomy (SLL) procedure after primary chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multi-institution clinical cooperative trial, 202 eligible patients with a negative SLL were randomly selected to receive either 15 mCi IP 32P (n = 104) or no further therapy (NFT; n = 98).
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 63 months in living patients, 68 patients in the IP 32P group (65%) and 63 patients in the NFT group (64%) have developed tumor recurrence. The relative risk of recurrence is 0.90 (IP 32P to NFT) (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 1.19). The 5-year RFS rate is 42% and 36% for the IP 32P and NFT groups, respectively; the difference is not statistically significant (log-rank test, P =.27). There was no statistically significant difference in OS (P =.19). The relative risk of death is 0.85 (IP 32P to NFT) (90% CI, 0.62 to 1.16). Sixteen patients (8%) experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, with eight in each respective group.
CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal chromic phosphate did not decrease the risk of relapse or improve survival for patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer after a negative SLL. Despite complete pathologic remission at SLL after initial surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy, 61% of stage III ovarian cancer patients had tumor recurrence within 5 years of negative SLL. This indicates a need for more effective initial therapy and further studies of consolidation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12885800     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  16 in total

Review 1.  Maintenance chemotherapy: an evolving and increasingly acceptable strategy in cancer management.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Continued chemotherapy after complete response to primary therapy among women with advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Nan Rong; Patrick O Monahan; Paridha Gupta; Champ Thomaskutty; Daniela Matei
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Surgical second-look in epithelial ovarian cancer: high recurrence rate after negative results and lack of survival benefit limits its role in standard management.

Authors:  Salih Taşkın; Mete Güngör; Elif Aylin Taşkın; Fırat Ortaç
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-03-01

Review 4.  Abagovomab: an anti-idiotypic CA-125 targeted immunotherapeutic agent for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rachel N Grisham; Jonathan Berek; Jacobus Pfisterer; Paul Sabbatini
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 5.  Ovarian cancer (advanced).

Authors:  Sean Kehoe; Jo Morrison
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-01-16

6.  Consolidation strategies in ovarian cancer: observations for future clinical trials.

Authors:  Paul Sabbatini; David Spriggs; Carol Aghajanian; Martee Hensley; William Tew; Jason Konner; Kathryn Bell-McGuinn; Margrit Juretzka; Alexia Iasonos
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Current status of maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joanie Mayer Hope; Stephanie V Blank
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 8.  Progress in gynecologic cancer research: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience.

Authors:  George A Omura
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Abagovomab as maintenance therapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase III trial of the AGO OVAR, COGI, GINECO, and GEICO--the MIMOSA study.

Authors:  Paul Sabbatini; Philipp Harter; Giovanni Scambia; Jalid Sehouli; Werner Meier; Pauline Wimberger; Klaus H Baumann; Christian Kurzeder; Barbara Schmalfeldt; David Cibula; Mariusz Bidzinski; Antonio Casado; Andrea Martoni; Nicoletta Colombo; Robert W Holloway; Luigi Selvaggi; Andrew Li; Jose del Campo; Karel Cwiertka; Tamas Pinter; Jan B Vermorken; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Simona Scartoni; Monica Bertolotti; Cecilia Simonelli; Angela Capriati; Carlo Alberto Maggi; Jonathan S Berek; Jacobus Pfisterer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Use of antibodies and immunoconjugates for the therapy of more accessible cancers.

Authors:  Robert M Sharkey; David M Goldenberg
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.