Literature DB >> 12885606

Influence of follow-up methodology and completeness on apparent clinical outcome of fundoplication.

Robert Ludemann1, David I Watson, Glyn G Jamieson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after surgery can be determined by face-to-face interview, interviewing patients by telephone, or by mailing out questionnaires. For reasons of convenience, many clinical research studies use mail survey methods. Mail-out responses, however, are rarely complete, and patients returning mail-out questionnaires might be different from patients who do not return questionnaires.
METHODS: We identified a group of 75 patients who were all sent a mail-out questionnaire 5 or more years after a laparoscopic fundoplication. Some of these patients returned questionnaires and some did not. All patients were subsequently interviewed by telephone. The responses to the two different data collection methods were compared as well as the interview responses of patients who returned questionnaires with those of patients who did not to determine the influence of follow-up methodology on apparent clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Of the 75 patients interviewed, 49 patients (65%) had previously returned a mail-out questionnaire and 26 patients had not. The mean time difference between mail-out response and telephone interview was 1 month. When mail-out responses were compared with interview responses of the patients who had returned questionnaires, equivalent answers were obtained for all symptoms except for dysphagia, for which a higher incidence and greater scores were reported by patients in their mail-out questionnaire responses. When mail-out nonresponders were compared with responders, the nonresponders had a lower level of overall satisfaction with the outcome of surgery, a higher incidence of dysphagia, and greater levels of heartburn.
CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of surgical outcomes using a mail-out questionnaire may not be an accurate method of assessing patient symptoms and satisfaction after surgery, particularly if follow-up is incomplete. In this study, patients not responding to mail-out questionnaires were more likely to have adverse symptoms and a lower level of satisfaction than patients returning questionnaires. This dissatisfaction could make patients less likely to return mail-out questionnaires, and for this reason studies with incomplete follow-up that rely on mail-out questionnaire responses may report erroneously higher surgical success rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12885606     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00175-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  15 in total

1.  Austrian experiences with redo antireflux surgery.

Authors:  H Wykypiel; T Kamolz; P Steiner; A Klingler; F A Granderath; R Pointner; G J Wetscher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Chronic pain and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair using the COMI-hernia score.

Authors:  Ralph Fabian Staerkle; Raphael Nicolas Vuille-Dit-Bille; Lukas Fink; Christopher Soll; Peter Villiger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Nissen or partial posterior fundoplication: which antireflux procedure has a lower rate of side effects?

Authors:  Heinz Wykypiel; Michael Gadenstaetter; Alexander Klaus; Paul Klingler; Gerold J Wetscher
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Laparoscopic anterior versus posterior fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Muhammed Ashraf Memon; Manjunath S Subramanya; Md Belal Hossain; Rossita Mohamad Yunus; Shahjahan Khan; Breda Memon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Survey mode influence on patient-reported outcome scores in orthopaedic surgery: telephone results may be positively biased.

Authors:  Jon E Hammarstedt; John M Redmond; Asheesh Gupta; Kevin F Dunne; S Pavan Vemula; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Esophageal manometry and clinical outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Huiqi Yang; David I Watson; Jamie Kelly; Carolyn J Lally; Jennifer C Myers; Glyn G Jamieson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Differential item functioning to validate setting of delivery compatibility in PROMIS-global health.

Authors:  Dylan J Parker; Paul M Werth; David D Christensen; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Evaluation of clinical outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery in clinical practice: still a controversial issue.

Authors:  Sandro Contini; Carmelo Scarpignato
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2011-09-11

9.  Reliability of patient-reported functional outcome in a joint replacement registry. A comparison of primary responders and non-responders in the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  Anne Polk; Jeppe V Rasmussen; Stig Brorson; Bo S Olsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  The durability of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: 11-year outcomes.

Authors:  Craig B Morgenthal; Matthew D Shane; Alessandro Stival; Nana Gletsu; Graham Milam; Vickie Swafford; John G Hunter; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.