Literature DB >> 12884068

Global distribution and outcomes for Candida species causing invasive candidiasis: results from an international randomized double-blind study of caspofungin versus amphotericin B for the treatment of invasive candidiasis.

A L Colombo1, J Perfect, M DiNubile, K Bartizal, M Motyl, P Hicks, R Lupinacci, C Sable, N Kartsonis.   

Abstract

In a randomized study, caspofungin was compared with amphotericin B for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in a total of 239 adults from 56 sites in 20 countries. This study provided a unique opportunity to assess the frequency and outcome of invasive candidiasis caused by different Candida species worldwide, and the results are presented here. Efficacy was primarily assessed at the end of intravenous therapy using a modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis. This analysis was performed on 224 of the 239 patients enrolled in the study. Attempts were made to collect baseline Candida isolates from all patients for species identification at a central laboratory. Yeasts were identified to the species level using two commercial systems and microscopic examination. Viable baseline isolates were recovered from 210 of the 224 (94%) patients included in the MITT analysis. Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated species in all regions and was responsible for 45% of cases overall. Nevertheless, the majority of cases of infection were caused by non- albicans Candida species. In the USA and Canada, Candida glabrata was the second most commonly isolated pathogen (18%). In contrast, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis accounted for 55% of cases in Latin America. Outcomes were comparable for patients treated with caspofungin (74% overall; 64% and 80% for infections due to Candida albicans and non- albicans species) and amphotericin B (62% overall; 58% and 68% for infections due to Candida albicans and non- albicans species), and were generally similar across continents. The distribution of Candida species isolated from patients enrolled in a clinical trial may not be representative of pathogens causing invasive candidiasis in the general population. Nevertheless, our findings may affect the regional choice of empirical antifungal therapy for seriously ill patients with suspected or documented invasive candidiasis since different Candida species have varying susceptibility to conventional antifungal drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12884068     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-003-0973-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  47 in total

1.  The epidemiology of candidaemia and mould infections in Australia.

Authors:  Monica A Slavin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  High rate of non-albicans candidemia in Brazilian tertiary care hospitals.

Authors:  A L Colombo; M Nucci; R Salomão; M L Branchini; R Richtmann; A Derossi; S B Wey
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 3.  International Conference for the Development of a Consensus on the Management and Prevention of Severe Candidal Infections.

Authors:  J E Edwards; G P Bodey; R A Bowden; T Büchner; B E de Pauw; S G Filler; M A Ghannoum; M Glauser; R Herbrecht; C A Kauffman; S Kohno; P Martino; F Meunier; T Mori; M A Pfaller; J H Rex; T R Rogers; R H Rubin; J Solomkin; C Viscoli; T J Walsh; M White
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Cluster of Candida parapsilosis primary bloodstream infection in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  C L da Silva; R M dos Santos; A L Colombo
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.949

5.  International surveillance of blood stream infections due to Candida species in the European SENTRY Program: species distribution and antifungal susceptibility including the investigational triazole and echinocandin agents. SENTRY Participant Group (Europe).

Authors:  M A Pfaller; R N Jones; G V Doern; A C Fluit; J Verhoef; H S Sader; S A Messer; A Houston; S Coffman; R J Hollis
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 6.  Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance.

Authors:  V Krcmery; A J Barnes
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Caspofungin: pharmacology, safety and therapeutic potential in superficial and invasive fungal infections.

Authors:  A H Groll; T J Walsh
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.206

8.  Candidemia in non-neutropenic patients with an intravenous hyperalimentation catheter: good prognosis of Candida parapsilosis infection.

Authors:  S Kataoka; M Kashiwa; K Saku; N Handa; H Akiyama
Journal:  Kansenshogaku Zasshi       Date:  1995-09

9.  Increasing incidence of candidemia: results from a 20-year nationwide study in Iceland.

Authors:  Lena Rós Asmundsdóttir; Helga Erlendsdóttir; Magnús Gottfredsson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Non-albicans Candida infections in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Semin Respir Infect       Date:  2002-06
View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare Micafungin with Fluconazole in the Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Woo-Hyoung Kang; Gi-Won Song; Sung-Gyu Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh; Kwang-Woong Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Jae Won Joh; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Jong Man Kim; Dong Lak Choi; Joo Dong Kim; Myoung Soo Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Comparison of the fungicidal activities of caspofungin and amphotericin B against Candida glabrata.

Authors:  Francesco Barchiesi; Elisabetta Spreghini; Serena Tomassetti; Daniela Arzeni; Daniele Giannini; Giorgio Scalise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Treatment of Candida glabrata infection in immunosuppressed mice by using a combination of liposomal amphotericin B with caspofungin or micafungin.

Authors:  Jon A Olson; Jill P Adler-Moore; P J Smith; Richard T Proffitt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Monitoring Phenotypic Switching in Candida albicans and the Use of Next-Gen Fluorescence Reporters.

Authors:  Corey Frazer; Aaron D Hernday; Richard J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Protoc Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-12

6.  Curcumin-mediated anti-microbial photodynamic therapy against Candida dubliniensis biofilms.

Authors:  Paula Volpato Sanitá; Ana Cláudia Pavarina; Lívia Nordi Dovigo; Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro; Mariana Carvalho Andrade; Ewerton Garcia de Oliveira Mima
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  Echinocandin resistance, susceptibility testing and prophylaxis: implications for patient management.

Authors:  David S Perlin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Budding off: bringing functional genomics to Candida albicans.

Authors:  Matthew Z Anderson; Richard J Bennett
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Effects of immune suppression in murine models of disseminated Candida glabrata and Candida tropicalis infection and utility of a synthetic peptide vaccine.

Authors:  Hong Xin
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Routine use of a commercial test, GLABRATA RTT, for rapid identification of Candida glabrata in six laboratories.

Authors:  A M Freydiere; J D Perry; O Faure; B Willinger; A M Tortorano; A Nicholson; J Peman; P E Verweij
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.