Literature DB >> 12884032

Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP).

Maria De Lourdes Levy1, Victor Larcher, Ronald Kurz.   

Abstract

Informed consent means approval of the legal representative of the child and/or of the competent child for medical interventions following appropriate information. National legal regulations differ in regard to the question when a child has the full right to give his or her autonomous consent. Informed assent means a child's agreement to medical procedures in circumstances where he or she is not legally authorised or lacks sufficient understanding for giving consent competently. Doctors should carefully listen to the opinion and wishes of children who are not able to give full consent and should strive to obtain their assent. Doctors have the responsibility to determine the ability and competence of the child for giving his or her consent or assent. All children, even those not judged as competent, have a right to receive information given in a way that they can understand and give their assent or dissent. This consent/assent process must promote and protect the dignity, privacy and confidentiality of the child and his or her family. Consent or assent is required for all aspects of medical care, for preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic measures and research. Children may effectively refuse treatment or procedures which are not necessary to save their lives or prevent serious harm. Where treatment is necessary to save a life or prevent serious harm, the doctor has the duty to act in the best interest of the child. However, parents may also refuse to consent and in this case national laws and legal mechanisms for resolving disputes may be used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12884032     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-003-1193-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  7 in total

1.  Decision making in extreme situations involving children: withholding or withdrawal of life supporting treatment in paediatric care. Statement of the ethics working group of the Confederation of the European Specialists of Paediatrics (CESP).

Authors:  R Kurz
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  The family rule: a framework for obtaining ethical consent for medical interventions from children.

Authors:  D M Foreman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Listening to children: have we gone too far (or not far enough)?

Authors:  R Lansdown
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Children as decision makers: guidelines for pediatricians.

Authors:  N M King; A W Cross
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Guidelines for informed consent in biomedical research involving paediatric populations as research participants.

Authors:  Dennis Gill
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Empirical examination of the ability of children to consent to clinical research.

Authors:  N Ondrusek; R Abramovitch; P Pencharz; G Koren
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Can children withhold consent to treatment?

Authors:  J A Devereux; D P Jones; D L Dickenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29
  7 in total
  30 in total

1.  Age estimation for forensic purposes in Italy: ethical issues.

Authors:  Martina Focardi; Vilma Pinchi; Federica De Luca; Gian-Aristide Norelli
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  The concepts of assent and parental permission in pediatrics.

Authors:  Urh Groselj
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  Author reply: To PMID 23775677.

Authors:  Hassib Narchi
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 4.  A right to confidentiality or a duty to disclose? Ethical guidance for conducting prevention research with children and adolescents.

Authors:  Ioana E Hiriscau; Nicola Stingelin-Giles; Christina Stadler; Klaus Schmeck; Stella Reiter-Theil
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  Intravenous magnesium for pediatric sickle cell vaso-occlusive crisis: methodological issues of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Oluwakemi Badaki-Makun; J Paul Scott; Julie A Panepinto; T Charles Casper; Cheryl A Hillery; J Michael Dean; David C Brousseau
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Parental Perceptions About Informed Consent/Assent in Pediatric Research in Jordan.

Authors:  Omar F Khabour; Mahmoud A Alomari; Nihaya A Al-Sheyab
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Consent in paediatric neurosurgery: adequacy of documentation and parental perspectives.

Authors:  Adikarige H D Silva; Haren Wijesinghe; Nilesh Mundil; William Lo; A Richard Walsh; Guirish A Solanki; Desiderio Rodrigues
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Five-year experience of clinical ethics consultations in a pediatric teaching hospital.

Authors:  Jürg C Streuli; Georg Staubli; Marlis Pfändler-Poletti; Ruth Baumann-Hölzle; Jörg Ersch
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Ethical assessment of pediatric research protocols.

Authors:  Robert D Truog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Ethical issues in measuring biomarkers in children's environmental health.

Authors:  Peter D Sly; Brenda Eskenazi; Jenny Pronczuk; Radim Srám; Fernando Diaz-Barriga; Diego Gonzalez Machin; David O Carpenter; Simona Surdu; Eric M Meslin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.