Literature DB >> 12883816

Voice quality change in future professional voice users after 9 months of voice training.

Bernadette Timmermans1, Marc De Bodt, Floris Wuyts, Paul Van de Heyning.   

Abstract

Sixty-eight students of a school for audiovisual communication participated in this study. A part of them, 49 students, received voice training for 9 months (the trained group); 19 subjects received no specific voice training (the untrained group). A multidimensional test battery containing the GRBAS scale, videolaryngostroboscopy, Maximum Phonation Time (MPT), jitter, lowest intensity (IL), highest frequency (FoH), Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI) was applied before and after training to evaluate training outcome. The voice training is made up of technical workshops in small groups (five to eight subjects) and vocal coaching in the ateliers. In the technical workshops, basic skills are trained (posture, breathing technique, articulation and diction), and in the ateliers, the speech and language pathologist assists the subjects in the practice of their voice work. This study revealed a significant amelioration over time for the objective measurements [Dysphonia Severity Index: from 2.3 to 4.5 ( P<0.001)] and the self-evaluation [Voice Handicap Index, from 23 to 18.4 ( P=0.016)] for the trained group only. This outcome favors the systematic introduction of voice training during the schooling of professional voice users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12883816     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-003-0652-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  4 in total

1.  A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS).

Authors:  P H Dejonckere; P Bradley; P Clemente; G Cornut; L Crevier-Buchman; G Friedrich; P Van De Heyning; M Remacle; V Woisard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  A study of the effectiveness of voice therapy in the treatment of 45 patients with nonorganic dysphonia.

Authors:  P N Carding; I A Horsley; G J Docherty
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Poor voice quality in future elite vocal performers and professional voice users.

Authors:  B Timmermans; M S De Bodt; F L Wuyts; A Boudewijns; G Clement; A Peeters; P H Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach.

Authors:  F L Wuyts; M S De Bodt; G Molenberghs; M Remacle; L Heylen; B Millet; K Van Lierde; J Raes; P H Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.297

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Psychological effects of preventive voice care training in student teachers].

Authors:  M Nusseck; B Richter; M Echternach; C Spahn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Effects of Vocal Training on Students' Voices in a Professional Drama School.

Authors:  Jacob I Tower; Lynn Acton; Jessica Wolf; Walton Wilson; Nwanmegha Young
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2019-08-01

Review 3.  Interventions for preventing voice disorders in adults.

Authors:  J H Ruotsalainen; J Sellman; L Lehto; M Jauhiainen; J H Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.