Literature DB >> 12883420

Epidural, cerebrospinal fluid, and plasma pharmacokinetics of epidural opioids (part 1): differences among opioids.

Christopher M Bernards1, Danny D Shen, Emily S Sterling, Jason E Adkins, Linda Risler, Brian Phillips, Wolfgang Ummenhofer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of epidurally administered drugs has been the subject of many studies, yet drug concentration in the epidural space has never been measured. This study was undertaken to characterize the epidural, cerebrospinal fluid, and plasma pharmacokinetics of epidurally administered opioids on the basis of measurement of drug concentration in each of these compartments after epidural administration.
METHODS: Morphine plus alfentanil, fentanyl, or sufentanil were administered epidurally in anesthetized pigs. Microdialysis was used to sample the epidural space and the cerebrospinal fluid for measurement of opioid concentration over time. Plasma samples were obtained from the central venous plasma and the epidural venous plasma. These data were used to calculate relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, including mean residence time, elimination half-lives, areas under the concentration versus time curves, clearance, and volume of distribution for each opioid in each compartment.
RESULTS: Some of the more important findings were that the cerebrospinal fluid and plasma pharmacokinetics of the opioids did not parallel their epidural pharmacokinetics and that their hydrophobic character governed multiple aspects of their lumbar epidural pharmacokinetics.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the spinal pharmacokinetics of these drugs are complex and, in some ways, counterintuitive. Also, the bioavailability of opioids in the cerebrospinal fluid and epidural space is determined primarily by their hydrophobicity, with less hydrophobic drugs having greater bioavailability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12883420     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  9 in total

1.  Spinal disposition and meningeal permeability of local anesthetics.

Authors:  Rozenn Clément; Jean-Marc Malinovsky; Patrice Hildgen; Gilles Dollo; Jean Pierre Estèbe; François Chevanne; Roger Le Verge; Pascal Le Corre
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Analysis of Multiple Routes of Analgesic Administration in the Immediate Postoperative Period: a 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Nalini Vadivelu; Alice M Kai; Feng Dai; Susan Dabu-Bondoc
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-03-11

Review 3.  Neuraxial morphine and respiratory depression: finding the right balance.

Authors:  Pervez Sultan; Maria Cristina Gutierrez; Brendan Carvalho
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Neuraxial drug administration: a review of treatment options for anaesthesia and analgesia.

Authors:  Stephan A Schug; David Saunders; Irina Kurowski; Michael J Paech
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Epidural Oxycodone for Acute Pain.

Authors:  Panu Piirainen; Hannu Kokki; Merja Kokki
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23

6.  A comparative study of intrathecal and epidural buprenorphine using combined spinal-epidural technique for caesarean section.

Authors:  Shaloo Ipe; Sara Korula; Sreelatha Varma; Grace Maria George; Saramma P Abraham; Leena Rachel Koshy
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-05

7.  Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Different Doses of Epidural Hydromorphone Coadministered with Ropivacaine after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Meijuan Yang; Luyang Wang; Hong Chen; Yuwen Tang; Xinzhong Chen
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  A clinical approach to neuraxial morphine for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Borja Mugabure Bujedo
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-02

9.  Open field and a behavior score in PNT model for neuropathic pain in pigs.

Authors:  David Castel; Itai Sabbag; Elvira Nasaev; Sean Peng; Sigal Meilin
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.133

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.