Literature DB >> 12882851

Out-of-pocket costs and diabetes preventive services: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study.

Andrew J Karter1, Mark R Stevens, William H Herman, Susan Ettner, David G Marrero, Monika M Safford, Michael M Engelgau, J David Curb, Arleen F Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the increased shifting of health care costs to consumers, little is known about the impact of financial barriers on health care utilization. This study investigated the effect of out-of-pocket expenditures on the utilization of recommended diabetes preventive services. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a survey-based observational study (2000-2001) in 10 managed care health plans and 68 provider groups across the U.S. serving approximately 180,000 patients with diabetes. From 11,922 diabetic survey respondents, we studied the occurrence of self-reported annual dilated eye exams and diabetes health education and among insulin users, daily self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Conditional probabilities were estimated for outcomes at each level of self-reported out-of-pocket expenditure by using hierarchical logistic regression models with random intercepts.
RESULTS: Conditional probabilities of utilization (95% CI) varied by expenditure for dilated eye exam [no cost 78% (75-82), copay 79% (75-82), and full price 70% (64-75); P < 0.0001]; diabetes health education [no cost 29% (23-36), copay 29% (23-36), and full price 19% (14-25); P < 0.0001]; and daily SMBG [no cost 75% (68-81), copay 68% (60-75), and full price 59% (49-68); P < 0.0001]. Extensive adjustment for patient factors had no discernible effect on the estimates or their significance, and cost-utilization relationships were similar across income levels and other patient characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: Benefit packages structured to derive greater fiscal contribution from the health plan membership result in suboptimal use of diabetes preventive services and may thus lead to poorer clinical outcomes, greater future costs, and lower health plan quality ratings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12882851     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.8.2294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  28 in total

1.  Patient and provider perceptions of care for diabetes: results of the cross-national DAWN Study.

Authors:  M Peyrot; R R Rubin; T Lauritzen; S E Skovlund; F J Snoek; D R Matthews; R Landgraf
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 2.  Role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in glycemic control.

Authors:  Andrew J Karter
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose before and after Medicare expansion among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes who do not use insulin.

Authors:  Rui Li; Ping Zhang; K M Venkat Narayan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Barriers to care and comorbidities along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Authors:  Hendrik Dirk de Heer; Hector Guillermo Balcázar; Osvaldo F Morera; Lisa Lapeyrouse; Josiah McC Heyman; Jennifer Salinas; Ruth E Zambrana
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Health disparities in endocrine disorders: biological, clinical, and nonclinical factors--an Endocrine Society scientific statement.

Authors:  Sherita Hill Golden; Arleen Brown; Jane A Cauley; Marshall H Chin; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Catherine Kim; Julie Ann Sosa; Anne E Sumner; Blair Anton
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Using uncertain data from body-worn sensors to gain insight into type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Nathaniel Heintzman; Samantha Kleinberg
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Correlates of depression among people with diabetes: The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study.

Authors:  Beth Waitzfelder; Robert B Gerzoff; Andrew J Karter; Stephen Crystal; Mathew J Bair; Susan L Ettner; Arleen F Brown; Usha Subramanian; Shou-En Lu; David Marrero; William H Herman; Joseph V Selby; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 8.  Psychosocial factors in medication adherence and diabetes self-management: Implications for research and practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Molly L Tanenbaum; Persis V Commissariat
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2016-10

9.  Reliability and validity of an instrument for assessing patients' perceptions about medications for diabetes: the PAM-D.

Authors:  Patrick O Monahan; Kathleen A Lane; Risa P Hayes; Colleen A McHorney; David G Marrero
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Health systems, patients factors, and quality of care for diabetes: a synthesis of findings from the TRIAD study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.