PURPOSE: To examine the molecular genetic basis and phenotypic characteristics of an unusual late-onset autosomal dominant macular dystrophy with features of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in a large family (SUNY901), by using linkage and mutation analyses. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 17 affected members, 17 clinically unaffected members, and 5 unrelated spouses. Clinical analyses included a review of medical history and standard ophthalmic examination with fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and electroretinography. Linkage and haplotype analyses were performed with microsatellite markers. Mutation analysis was performed by amplification of exons followed by sequencing. RESULTS: A wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes including exudative and nonexudative maculopathy was observed, with onset in the late fifth decade. Linkage analysis excluded most of the previously known maculopathy loci. Markers D6S1604 (Z(max) of 3.18 at theta = 0), and D6S282 (Z(max) of 3.18 at theta = 0) gave significant positive LOD scores and haplotype analysis localized the disease gene to a 9-centimorgan (cM) interval between markers D6S1616 and D6S459. Mutation analysis excluded the GUCA1A and GUCA1B genes and revealed a missense mutation in the RDS/peripherin gene leading to a Tyr141Cys substitution. A phenotype and haplotype comparison between this and a separate family with the Tyr141Cys mutation suggested the presence of a common ancestral haplotype. CONCLUSIONS: The RDS mutation in codon 141 is associated with an unusual AMD-like late-onset maculopathy. An apparent selective bias was noted favoring the transmission of the mutant allele. These observations broaden the spectrum of phenotypes associated with RDS gene mutations.
PURPOSE: To examine the molecular genetic basis and phenotypic characteristics of an unusual late-onset autosomal dominant macular dystrophy with features of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in a large family (SUNY901), by using linkage and mutation analyses. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 17 affected members, 17 clinically unaffected members, and 5 unrelated spouses. Clinical analyses included a review of medical history and standard ophthalmic examination with fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and electroretinography. Linkage and haplotype analyses were performed with microsatellite markers. Mutation analysis was performed by amplification of exons followed by sequencing. RESULTS: A wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes including exudative and nonexudative maculopathy was observed, with onset in the late fifth decade. Linkage analysis excluded most of the previously known maculopathy loci. Markers D6S1604 (Z(max) of 3.18 at theta = 0), and D6S282 (Z(max) of 3.18 at theta = 0) gave significant positive LOD scores and haplotype analysis localized the disease gene to a 9-centimorgan (cM) interval between markers D6S1616 and D6S459. Mutation analysis excluded the GUCA1A and GUCA1B genes and revealed a missense mutation in the RDS/peripherin gene leading to a Tyr141Cys substitution. A phenotype and haplotype comparison between this and a separate family with the Tyr141Cys mutation suggested the presence of a common ancestral haplotype. CONCLUSIONS: The RDS mutation in codon 141 is associated with an unusual AMD-like late-onset maculopathy. An apparent selective bias was noted favoring the transmission of the mutant allele. These observations broaden the spectrum of phenotypes associated with RDS gene mutations.
Authors: A D Marmorstein; L Y Marmorstein; M Rayborn; X Wang; J G Hollyfield; K Petrukhin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-11-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M L Klein; D W Schultz; A Edwards; T C Matise; K Rust; C B Berselli; K Trzupek; R G Weleber; J Ott; M K Wirtz; T S Acott Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 1998-08
Authors: R Allikmets; N F Shroyer; N Singh; J M Seddon; R A Lewis; P S Bernstein; A Peiffer; N A Zabriskie; Y Li; A Hutchinson; M Dean; J R Lupski; M Leppert Journal: Science Date: 1997-09-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: E M Stone; A J Lotery; F L Munier; E Héon; B Piguet; R H Guymer; K Vandenburgh; P Cousin; D Nishimura; R E Swiderski; G Silvestri; D A Mackey; G S Hageman; A C Bird; V C Sheffield; D F Schorderet Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: P J Francis; D W Schultz; A M Gregory; M B Schain; R Barra; J Majewski; J Ott; T Acott; R G Weleber; M L Klein Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Tylor R Lewis; Mustafa S Makia; Carson M Castillo; Muayyad R Al-Ubaidi; Muna I Naash; Vadim Y Arshavsky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Charles J Wolock; Nicholas Stong; Chu Jian Ma; Takayuki Nagasaki; Winston Lee; Stephen H Tsang; Sitharthan Kamalakaran; David B Goldstein; Rando Allikmets Journal: Genet Med Date: 2019-03-30 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Melissa J Reeves; Kerry E Goetz; Bin Guan; Ehsan Ullah; Delphine Blain; Wadih M Zein; Santa J Tumminia; Robert B Hufnagel Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2020-07-05 Impact factor: 4.700
Authors: Tylor R Lewis; Mustafa S Makia; Mashal Kakakhel; Muayyad R Al-Ubaidi; Vadim Y Arshavsky; Muna I Naash Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 5.505