Literature DB >> 12882462

Development of the satisfaction with inhaled asthma treatment questionnaire.

J L Campbell1, G M Kiebert, M R Partridge.   

Abstract

For the management of a condition such as asthma, patients should feel confident with their medication, feel that the treatment is adequate in controlling symptoms and that side-effects of the treatment are minimal. As no comprehensive instrument to measure patient satisfaction with inhaled asthma medication existed, the Satisfaction with Asthma Treatment Questionnaire was developed. The procedures that were used are described, and the initial validation and reliability tests are reported. The study involved focus group meetings, development, testing and modification of a preliminary instrument, and testing of the revised instrument using different samples of patients with asthma. Factor analysis of the 26-item questionnaire identified four domains reflecting four aspects of satisfaction: effectiveness of treatment, ease of use, medication burden, and side-effects and worries. Cronbach's alpha showed evidence of internal consistency reliability. Test/retest reliability ranged from 0.66-0.74. Interscale correlations were moderate-to-high. Significant correlations were found between domain and overall scale scores and patients' overall level of satisfaction. The Satisfaction with Asthma Treatment Questionnaire is potentially a useful instrument for gaining insight into patient satisfaction with inhaled treatment for asthma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12882462     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00097503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  10 in total

Review 1.  Treatment satisfaction instruments for different purposes during a product's lifecycle: keeping the end in mind.

Authors:  Diana Rofail; Fiona Taylor; Antoine Regnault; Anna Filonenko
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Burden of treatment for chronic illness: a concept analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Adem Sav; Michelle A King; Jennifer A Whitty; Elizabeth Kendall; Sara S McMillan; Fiona Kelly; Beth Hunter; Amanda J Wheeler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Psychometric evaluation of the Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q), a novel measure to assess satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Emuella M Flood; Kathleen M Beusterien; Hannah Green; Richard Shikiar; Robert W Baran; Mayur M Amonkar; David Cella
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 4.  Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barbra Katusiime; Sarah Corlett; Joanne Reeve; Janet Krska
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2016-10-04

5.  Validation of the Polish version of Satisfaction with Asthma Treatment Questionnaire (SATQ).

Authors:  Katarzyna Dońka; Krzysztof J Czarnocki; Andrzej Emeryk
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Development and Pretesting of a Questionnaire to Assess Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM Questionnaire).

Authors:  Merel L Kimman; Adrienne H Rotteveel; Marlies Wijsenbeek; Rémy Mostard; Nelleke C Tak; Xana van Jaarsveld; Marjolein Storm; Kioa L Wijnsma; Marielle Gelens; Nicole C A J van de Kar; Jack Wetzels; Carmen D Dirksen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  A systematic literature review of the assessment of treatment burden experienced by patients and their caregivers.

Authors:  Orla C Sheehan; Bruce Leff; Christine S Ritchie; Sarah K Garrigues; Lingsheng Li; Debra Saliba; Roya Fathi; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Renly Lim; Lisa Kalisch Ellett; Elizabeth E Roughead; Phaik Yeong Cheah; Nashwa Masnoon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  A comparison of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy vs. conventional best practice in asthma management.

Authors:  R Louis; G Joos; A Michils; G Vandenhoven
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Satisfaction levels and asthma control amongst Malaysian asthmatic patients on budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy: experience in a real-life setting.

Authors:  Roslina Abdul Manap; Li Cher Loh; Tengku Saifudin Tengku Ismail; Abdul Razak Muttalif; George Kutty Simon; Rosalind Beng Hong Toh; Mohd Razali Norhaya; Noor Aliza Md Tarekh; Che Wan Aminuddin Hashim; Mohammad Fauzi Abdul Rani; Aziah Ahmad Mahayiddin
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2012-11-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.