Literature DB >> 12882114

Identifying vascular access complications among ESRD patients in Europe. A prospective, multicenter study.

Monique M Elseviers1, Jean-Pierre Van Waeleghem.   

Abstract

The pilot project of the Research Board of the EDTNA/ERCA was aimed at reviewing the management of vascular access (VA) in European dialysis centres (see August 1999 NN&I). In Part 1 of this study, centre policies related to VA management were investigated. In Part 2, detailed in this article, individual patients were prospectively followed for one year to identify VA-related complications. A cohort of 1,380 adult patients randomly selected from 47 centres in 16 European countries was followed for one year using a computerised data collection system. Data were collected at baseline after 6 and 12 months and each time a VA complication occurred. At the start of the observation period, 77% of patients had a native arteriovenous (AV) fistula, 10% had an AV graft, and 13% had a catheter for access. A total of 489 complications were noted during the one-year period. Most frequently observed were thrombosis, stenosis, infection, bleeding, and flow problems. Hospitalisation (mean duration = 6.2 days) was required in 39% of patients with complications, and 29% of complications resulted in a definitive loss of VA. Complications were more frequently observed in patients with catheters (27%) and AV grafts (37%) compared to those with an AV fistula (15%). The risk of thrombosis was more than four times higher and the risk of bleeding was more than six times higher if an AV graft was used compared to an AV fistula. Catheters presented an eightfold increased risk for patients of developing infections and access flow problems. [figure: see text] This study revealed the high complication rate in VA and strengthened the notion that the AV fistula is the superior access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12882114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol News Issues        ISSN: 0896-1263


  7 in total

1.  Forensic issues in cases of fatal hemorrhage from arteriovenous dialysis access sites.

Authors:  Roger W Byard; Ross A James
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 2.  Complications of the Arteriovenous Fistula: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ahmed A Al-Jaishi; Aiden R Liu; Charmaine E Lok; Joyce C Zhang; Louise M Moist
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in patients on dialysis: are the benefits worth the risks?

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Mintu P Turakhia; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Attainment of clinical performance targets and improvement in clinical outcomes and resource use in hemodialysis care: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; Bernard G Jaar; John H Sadler; Nathan W Levin; Josef Coresh; Michael J Klag; Neil R Powe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Comparison of distal radiocephalic fistula vs proximal radiocephalic fistula.

Authors:  Biswajit Mishra
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-01-30

6.  Point-of-care ultrasound-guided cannulation versus standard cannulation in haemodialysis vascular access: protocol for a controlled random order crossover pilot and feasibility study.

Authors:  Monica L Schoch; Judy Currey; Liliana Orellana; Paul N Bennett; Vicki Smith; Alison M Hutchinson
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-11-26

7.  Cannulation technique and complications in arteriovenous fistulas: a Swedish Renal Registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Karin Staaf; Anders Fernström; Fredrik Uhlin
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.388

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.