Literature DB >> 12881378

Evaluation of The Netherlands breast cancer screening programme.

A L M Verbeek1, M J M Broeders.   

Abstract

The Netherlands breast cancer screening programme for women aged 50-75 years was gradually implemented during 1989-1997. Short-term indicators for this mammography screening are 80% attendance (800 000 examinations yearly), and for the subsequent screening examinations 7.4 referrals for clinical assessment per 1000 women screened, 4.7 biopsies and 3.6 breast cancers detected. Breast cancer mortality in The Netherlands has been decreasing since 1997 after having been stable for decades. The challenge now is to disentangle the relative contributions of mammographic screening, earlier clinical diagnosis, less aggressive tumours, treatment advances and risk factors towards this decline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12881378     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  9 in total

1.  Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?

Authors:  Chantal Van Ongeval; Andre Van Steen; Gretel Vande Putte; Federica Zanca; Hilde Bosmans; Guy Marchal; Erik Van Limbergen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Measurement in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Carolyn M Rutter; Aruna Kamineni; Eric A Johnson; Natasha K Stout; Noel S Weiss; V Paul Doria-Rose; Chyke A Doubeni; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival: a population-based study.

Authors:  W J Louwman; L V van de Poll-Franse; J Fracheboud; J A Roukema; J W W Coebergh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Beyond mammography screening: quality assurance in breast cancer diagnosis (The QuaMaDi Project).

Authors:  A Katalinic; C Bartel; H Raspe; I Schreer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Determinants of (non-)attendance at the Dutch cancer screening programmes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Hg Bongaerts; Frederike L Büchner; Barend Jc Middelkoop; Onno R Guicherit; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Perspectives on cancer screening participation in a highly urbanized region: a Q-methodology study in The Hague, the Netherlands.

Authors:  Thomas H G Bongaerts; Frederike L Büchner; Matty R Crone; Job van Exel; Onno R Guicherit; Mattijs E Numans; Vera Nierkens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 4.135

7.  Rising incidence of breast cancer among female cancer survivors: implications for surveillance.

Authors:  I Soerjomataram; W J Louwman; L E M Duijm; J W W Coebergh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173,797 patients.

Authors:  Sepideh Saadatmand; Reini Bretveld; Sabine Siesling; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-06

9.  Public Preferences and Predicted Uptake for Esophageal Cancer Screening Strategies: A Labeled Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Yonne Peters; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.396

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.