BACKGROUND/AIMS: An acute immunological stress reaction was previously reported to occur after the painful setting of retrobulbar anaesthesia before intraocular surgery. This study was conducted to find out whether an oral low dose premedication with midazolam would modify the immunological stress reaction. METHODS:32 patients undergoing intraocular surgery using retrobulbar anaesthesia were included in a randomised, double blind trial. They received premedication with either 3.75 mg midazolam or placebo 30 minutes before the retrobulbar injection. Counts of leucocyte subpopulations, cardiovascular, and psychometric parameters were measured repetitively before and after the retrobulbar injection. RESULTS: The numbers of leucocytes increased significantly in the placebo group after the setting of retrobulbar anaesthesia (before retrobulbar injection: 6687 (SD 1025) cells x10(6)/l; after injection: 7067 (1022) cells x10(6)/l, p=0.0009) caused by rising numbers of neutrophils (before injection: 4111 (1063) cells x10(6)/l; after injection: 4352 (1147) cells x10(6)/l, p=0.0007) and natural killer cells (before injection: 290 (84) cell x10(6)/l; after injection 354 (133) cells x10(6)/l, p=0.003). There was no significant increase in total leucocytes (before injection: 5997 (1288) cells x10(6)/l; after injection: 6189 (1215) cells x10(6)/l) or in any leucocyte subpopulation in the midazolam group. A significant rise in systolic blood pressure occurred in the placebo group, but not in the midazolam group. CONCLUSION: A low dose premedication with midazolam attenuates the immunological and cardiovascular stress reactions occurring with retrobulbar anaesthesia.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: An acute immunological stress reaction was previously reported to occur after the painful setting of retrobulbar anaesthesia before intraocular surgery. This study was conducted to find out whether an oral low dose premedication with midazolam would modify the immunological stress reaction. METHODS: 32 patients undergoing intraocular surgery using retrobulbar anaesthesia were included in a randomised, double blind trial. They received premedication with either 3.75 mg midazolam or placebo 30 minutes before the retrobulbar injection. Counts of leucocyte subpopulations, cardiovascular, and psychometric parameters were measured repetitively before and after the retrobulbar injection. RESULTS: The numbers of leucocytes increased significantly in the placebo group after the setting of retrobulbar anaesthesia (before retrobulbar injection: 6687 (SD 1025) cells x10(6)/l; after injection: 7067 (1022) cells x10(6)/l, p=0.0009) caused by rising numbers of neutrophils (before injection: 4111 (1063) cells x10(6)/l; after injection: 4352 (1147) cells x10(6)/l, p=0.0007) and natural killer cells (before injection: 290 (84) cell x10(6)/l; after injection 354 (133) cells x10(6)/l, p=0.003). There was no significant increase in total leucocytes (before injection: 5997 (1288) cells x10(6)/l; after injection: 6189 (1215) cells x10(6)/l) or in any leucocyte subpopulation in the midazolam group. A significant rise in systolic blood pressure occurred in the placebo group, but not in the midazolam group. CONCLUSION: A low dose premedication with midazolam attenuates the immunological and cardiovascular stress reactions occurring with retrobulbar anaesthesia.
Authors: J W ATHENS; O P HAAB; S O RAAB; A M MAUER; H ASHENBRUCKER; G E CARTWRIGHT; M M WINTROBE Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1961-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: B D Naliboff; D Benton; G F Solomon; J E Morley; J L Fahey; E T Bloom; T Makinodan; S L Gilmore Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 1991 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: R J Benschop; G L Godaert; R Geenen; J F Brosschot; M B De Smet; M Olff; C J Heijnen; R E Ballieux Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: J T Cacioppo; W B Malarkey; J K Kiecolt-Glaser; B N Uchino; S A Sgoutas-Emch; J F Sheridan; G G Berntson; R Glaser Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 1995 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: A M Morin; F G Vasters; H Wulf; G Geldner; C Kratz; U Hedderich; A Kussin; G Eisenhardt; L H J Eberhart Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 1.041