Literature DB >> 12880826

The single-epoch fMRI design: validation of a simplified paradigm for the collection of subjective ratings.

Tetsuo Koyama1, John G McHaffie, Paul J Laurienti, Robert C Coghill.   

Abstract

One of the goals of human functional imaging studies is to interpret brain activation in the context of an individual's subjective experience. However, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies usually employ a block design that consists of multiple epochs of stimulation; this strategy does not readily allow subjective responses to be assessed on a stimulus-by-stimulus basis. To address this issue, we developed a "single-epoch" design, consisting of a single stimulation period presented between two baseline periods. This allows subjective ratings to be acquired after each stimulus, while minimizing rating-induced confounds. To evaluate its sensitivity and utility, we obtained fMRI data using single-epoch and block designs (five stimuli between six baselines) and assessed regional brain activations evoked by both visual (a checkerboard pattern) and painful (noxious heat to right calf) stimuli. For both types of stimulation, data collected using the single-epoch design displayed activation patterns that were generally similar to those detected with the block design. Furthermore, only one single-epoch acquisition series was sufficient to detect bilateral activation in the visual cortex during visual stimulation and activation in the primary somatosensory cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, and other regions during painful stimulation. In addition, analyses of a series of single-epoch data from a single individual revealed a stimulus-by-stimulus decrease in the activation in the anterior cingulate cortex that paralleled the decrease in the subject's psychophysical responses. These findings confirm that the single-epoch design is sensitive to regional signal changes and serves as a viable alternative to the block design when the collection of subjective responses is of critical importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12880826     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00119-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  19 in total

1.  Localization of pain-related brain activation: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Emma G Duerden; Marie-Claire Albanese
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality.

Authors:  Tetsuo Koyama; John G McHaffie; Paul J Laurienti; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Neural Predictors of Decisions to Cognitively Control Emotion.

Authors:  Bruce Pierre Doré; Jochen Weber; Kevin Nicholas Ochsner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The contribution of the putamen to sensory aspects of pain: insights from structural connectivity and brain lesions.

Authors:  Christopher J Starr; Lumy Sawaki; George F Wittenberg; Jonathan H Burdette; Yoshitetsu Oshiro; Alexandre S Quevedo; John G McHaffie; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Cognitive regulation of ventromedial prefrontal activity evokes lasting change in the perceived self-relevance of persuasive messaging.

Authors:  Bruce P Doré; N Cooper; C Scholz; Matthew B O'Donnell; Emily B Falk
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Hick-Hyman Law is Mediated by the Cognitive Control Network in the Brain.

Authors:  Tingting Wu; Alexander J Dufford; Laura J Egan; Melissa-Ann Mackie; Cong Chen; Changhe Yuan; Chao Chen; Xiaobo Li; Xun Liu; Patrick R Hof; Jin Fan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Neural Mechanisms of Emotion Regulation Moderate the Predictive Value of Affective and Value-Related Brain Responses to Persuasive Messages.

Authors:  Bruce P Doré; Steven H Tompson; Matthew B O'Donnell; Lawrence C An; Victor Strecher; Emily B Falk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Brain mediators of predictive cue effects on perceived pain.

Authors:  Lauren Y Atlas; Niall Bolger; Martin A Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The cerebellum and pain: passive integrator or active participator?

Authors:  Eric A Moulton; Jeremy D Schmahmann; Lino Becerra; David Borsook
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2010-05-27

Review 10.  Human cerebellar responses to brush and heat stimuli in healthy and neuropathic pain subjects.

Authors:  D Borsook; E A Moulton; S Tully; J D Schmahmann; L Becerra
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.