Literature DB >> 1287986

Configural effects constrain Fourier models of pattern discrimination.

L A Olzak1, J P Thomas.   

Abstract

Many models of spatial pattern discrimination assume that judgments are based on information directly available from mechanisms tuned to limited ranges of spatial frequency and orientation. We tested the validity of this assumption for spatial frequency, orientation, and contrast information in a series of complex pattern discrimination experiments. Observers discriminated between simple gratings, between gratings masked by components that differed widely in spatial frequency and/or orientation, and between patterns that presented two cues to discrimination, one in each frequency and/or orientation band. Component cues were combined either in rigid-object correspondence (e.g. both components were rotated clockwise in one pattern and counterclockwise in the other) or in opposition (e.g. in one pattern one component was rotated clockwise, the other counterclockwise; the direction of rotation was reversed for each component in the second pattern). The results demonstrate that information from tuned pathways is not always used directly in making spatial judgments, but in some cases is combined across wide regions of the Fourier domain prior to the discrimination decision. We find two distinct patterns of combination that appear to independently signal information about texture and edges. These findings provide a potential link between low-level, spatially tuned analyzers in the visual system and higher-level pattern processing mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1287986     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90049-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations.

Authors:  Lynn A Olzak; Pentti I Laurinen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Contextual effects on fine orientation discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Stephanie A Saylor; Lynn A Olzak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.

Authors:  William H Ridder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Nonlinear processes in visual pattern discrimination.

Authors:  H R Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ameliorating the combinatorial explosion with spatial frequency-matched combinations of V1 outputs.

Authors:  Sarah Hancock; David P McGovern; Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.