BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the abnormalities in insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and in impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS: Glucose tolerance was determined by oral glucose tolerance test in 289 non-diabetic subjects selected for this study (M : F, 160 : 129, mean age 42.2 +/- 11.0 (SD) years, mean body mass index (BMI) 24.9 +/- 4.2 kg/m(2)). Diabetic subjects were excluded from the study. The association of insulin resistance and beta-cell function (calculated by HOMA model) with IFG and IGT was studied using linear and multiple logistic regression analyses. Subjects with normoglycaemia (NGT) were used as controls. RESULTS: Insulin resistance was significantly more in IFG and in IGT than in NGT. beta-cell dysfunction was significantly higher in IFG than in IGT. IFG was associated with both insulin resistance (OR = 9.11, p < 0.001) and beta-cell dysfunction (inverse correlation, OR = 0.103, p < 0.001), while only insulin resistance was significantly associated with IGT (OR = 1.24, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In urban South Asian Indians, IFG differed from IGT in having combined insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction, while IGT was associated only with insulin resistance. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the abnormalities in insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and in impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS:Glucose tolerance was determined by oral glucose tolerance test in 289 non-diabetic subjects selected for this study (M : F, 160 : 129, mean age 42.2 +/- 11.0 (SD) years, mean body mass index (BMI) 24.9 +/- 4.2 kg/m(2)). Diabetic subjects were excluded from the study. The association of insulin resistance and beta-cell function (calculated by HOMA model) with IFG and IGT was studied using linear and multiple logistic regression analyses. Subjects with normoglycaemia (NGT) were used as controls. RESULTS:Insulin resistance was significantly more in IFG and in IGT than in NGT. beta-cell dysfunction was significantly higher in IFG than in IGT. IFG was associated with both insulin resistance (OR = 9.11, p < 0.001) and beta-cell dysfunction (inverse correlation, OR = 0.103, p < 0.001), while only insulin resistance was significantly associated with IGT (OR = 1.24, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In urban South Asian Indians, IFG differed from IGT in having combined insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction, while IGT was associated only with insulin resistance. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Leigh Perreault; Bryan C Bergman; Mary C Playdon; Chiara Dalla Man; Claudio Cobelli; Robert H Eckel Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Diedre Winner; Luke Norton; Mustafa Kanat; Ruth Arya; Marcel Fourcaudot; Andrea Hansis-Diarte; Devjit Tripathy; Ralph A DeFronzo; Christopher P Jenkinson; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Palany Raghupathy; Belavendra Antonisamy; Caroline H D Fall; Finney S Geethanjali; Samantha D Leary; Julia Saperia; G Priya; Abel Rajaratnam; Joseph Richard Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2007-01-16 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Baoqi Fan; Hongjiang Wu; Mai Shi; Aimin Yang; Eric S H Lau; Claudia H T Tam; Dandan Mao; Cadmon K P Lim; Alice P S Kong; Ronald C W Ma; Elaine Chow; Andrea O Y Luk; Juliana C N Chan Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 8.128
Authors: Alena Stancáková; Martin Javorský; Teemu Kuulasmaa; Steven M Haffner; Johanna Kuusisto; Markku Laakso Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Lisa R Staimez; Mary Beth Weber; Harish Ranjani; Mohammed K Ali; Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Lawrence S Phillips; Viswanathan Mohan; K M Venkat Narayan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 19.112