Literature DB >> 12878718

Perceived horizontal body position in healthy and paraplegic subjects: effect of centrifugation.

T Jarchow1, M Wirz, T Haslwanter, V Dietz, D Straumann.   

Abstract

The perception of body position is mainly mediated by otolith information and visual cues. It has been shown, however, that proprioceptive sources are also involved. To distinguish between the contributions of the vestibular and nonvisual extra-vestibular information to graviception, we tested the effects of a stimulus that leaves the vestibular input unchanged but modifies the information from sense organs located more caudal along the trunk. This was achieved by bringing subjects into a horizontal ear-down position and rotating them around an earth-vertical axis that coincided with the interaural axis. In this paradigm, through centrifugal force, the stimulation of the vestibular and the putative extravestibular graviceptive organs in the body becomes dissociated. Healthy subjects (n = 14) and paraplegic patients with lesions between T4 and T8 (n = 7) adjusted themselves to the perceived horizontal right-ear down body position under two conditions: one with constant velocity rotation (ROT, velocity =120 degrees /s) around the earth-vertical axis of the turntable, and one without rotation (BASE). Among healthy subjects, the individual differences between BASE and ROT varied widely in both the feet-up or feet-down direction. In contrast, adjustments in paraplegic patients during ROT were always in the feet-down direction compared with BASE. A model with two extravestibular graviceptive sensors could explain our results: one sensor is located rostral to T4, and the other is caudal to T8. A load on the rostral graviceptor is interpreted as a tilt of the body in the feet-up direction and shifts the adjustments of perceived body position feet-down; a load on the caudal receptor is interpreted as a tilt in the feet-down direction and shifts the perceived body position feet-up. During ROT, healthy subjects solve the discrepant inputs of both extravestibular graviceptors in a highly variable manner, while paraplegic subjects show less variability because they are restricted to only the rostral graviceptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878718     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01129.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  "Pusher syndrome" following cortical lesions that spare the thalamus.

Authors:  Leif Johannsen; Doris Broetz; Thomas Naegele; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Subjective visual vertical in erect/supine subjects and under microgravity: effects of lower body negative pressure.

Authors:  Marco Lucertini; Claudio De Angelis; Marialuisa Martelli; Valfredo Zolesi; Enrico Tomao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [The subjective perception of the vertical-a valuable parameter for determination of peripheral vestibular disorder in Menière's disease in the chronic phase?]

Authors:  L J Voß; S I Zabaneh; M Hölzl; H Olze; K Stölzel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Pilot study: Determination of the subjective trunk vertical in upright head position].

Authors:  M Hölzl; A Lappat; R Hülse; E Biesinger; C Arens; L Voß
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Asymmetries and three-dimensional features of vestibular cross-coupled stimuli illuminated through modeling.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; M Arjumand Masood; Chiran S Bhandari
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Human perceptual overestimation of whole body roll tilt in hypergravity.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Michael C Newman; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld; Laurence R Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Reflex control of the spine and posture: a review of the literature from a chiropractic perspective.

Authors:  Mark W Morningstar; Burl R Pettibon; Heidi Schlappi; Mark Schlappi; Trevor V Ireland
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2005-08-09

8.  Body Orientation Affects the Perceived Size of Objects.

Authors:  John J-J Kim; Meaghan E McManus; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.490

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.