Literature DB >> 12878714

Changes in reciprocal inhibition across the ankle joint with changes in external load and pedaling rate during bicycling.

H S Pyndt1, M Laursen, J B Nielsen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of reciprocal inhibition in the regulation of antagonistic ankle muscles during bicycling. A total of 20 subjects participated in the study. Reciprocal inhibition was induced by stimulation of the peroneal nerve (PN) at 1.2 times threshold for the M-response in the tibialis anterior muscle (TA) and recorded as a depression of the rectified soleus (SOL) EMG. Recordings were made during tonic plantar flexion and during bicycling on an ergometer bicycle. During tonic contraction, the amount of inhibition in the SOL EMG was linearly correlated to the amount of background EMG. This linear relation was used to calculate the expected amount of reciprocal inhibition at corresponding EMG levels during bicycling. During the early phase of down-stroke of bicycling at 60 revolutions per minute (RPM) and an external load of 1.0 kg, the amount of recorded reciprocal inhibition was significantly smaller than that calculated from the linear relation during tonic contraction. In nine subjects, the SOL H-reflex was used to evaluate the amount of inhibition. At a short conditioning test interval (2-3 ms), the PN stimulation depressed the SOL H-reflex when the subjects were at rest. This short latency inhibition was absent during downstroke, but appeared during upstroke just prior to and during TA activation. A positive linear relation was found between the level of SOL background EMG in early downstroke and the external load (0.5-2.5 kg) as well as the rate of pedaling (30-90 RPM at 1.0 kg external load). The amount of inhibition in the SOL EMG when expressed as a percentage of the background EMG activity decreased significantly with increasing load. During increased pedaling rate, a similar decrease was seen, but it did not reach a statistically significant level. The data illustrate that reciprocal inhibition of the soleus muscle is modulated during bicycling being small in downstroke when the SOL muscle is active and large in upstroke where the muscle is inactive and its antagonist becomes active. The depression of the inhibition in relation to increased load and pedaling rate likely reflects the need of reducing inhibition of the SOL motoneurons to ensure a sufficient activation of the muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878714     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00444.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  11 in total

1.  Voluntary activation of ankle muscles is accompanied by subcortical facilitation of their antagonists.

Authors:  Svend S Geertsen; Abraham T Zuur; Jens B Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Cadence-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii during arm cycling.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints.

Authors:  Jacques Duchateau; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Intensity matters: effects of cadence and power output on corticospinal excitability during arm cycling are phase and muscle dependent.

Authors:  E J Lockyer; R J Benson; A P Hynes; L R Alcock; A J Spence; D C Button; K E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Reciprocal Ia inhibition contributes to motoneuronal hyperpolarisation during the inactive phase of locomotion and scratching in the cat.

Authors:  Svend S Geertsen; Katinka Stecina; Claire F Meehan; Jens B Nielsen; Hans Hultborn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Differences in corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii between arm cycling and tonic contraction are not evident at the immediate onset of movement.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interhemispheric inhibition is different during arm cycling than a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction.

Authors:  Chris T Compton; Evan J Lockyer; Ryan J Benson; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  The role of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) in interlimb coordination of coupled arm movements in the parasagittal plane: I. APAs associated with fast discrete flexion and extension movements of one arm or of both arms ISO- and ANTI-directionally coupled.

Authors:  Roberto Esposti; Fausto G Baldissera
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Soleus H-reflex excitability during pedaling post-stroke.

Authors:  Sheila Schindler-Ivens; David A Brown; Gwyn N Lewis; Jens Bo Nielsen; Kathy L Ondishko; Jon Wieser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Changes in Corticospinal and Spinal Excitability to the Biceps Brachii with a Neutral vs. Pronated Handgrip Position Differ between Arm Cycling and Tonic Elbow Flexion.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Mark Richards; Garrick N Forman; Michael W R Holmes; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.