Literature DB >> 12878713

Song system auditory responses are stable and highly tuned during sedation, rapidly modulated and unselective during wakefulness, and suppressed by arousal.

Jessica A Cardin1, Marc F Schmidt.   

Abstract

We used auditory responsiveness in the avian song system to investigate the complex relationship between behavioral state and sensory processing in a high-order sensorimotor brain area. We present evidence from recordings in awake, anesthetized, and sleeping male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) that auditory responsiveness in nucleus HVc is profoundly affected by changes in behavioral state. In anesthetized and sleeping birds, auditory responses were characterized by an increase in firing rate that was selective for the bird's own song (BOS) and highly stable over time. In contrast, HVc responses during wakefulness were extremely variable and transitioned between undetectable and robust levels over short intervals. Surprisingly, auditory responses in awake birds were not selective for the BOS stimulus. The variability of HVc auditory responses in awake birds suggests that, as in mammals, wakefulness is not a uniform behavioral state. Rather, auditory responsiveness likely is continually influenced by variables such as arousal state. We therefore developed several experimental paradigms in which we could manipulate arousal levels during auditory stimulus presentation. In all cases, arousal suppressed HVc auditory responses. This effect was specific to the song system, as auditory responses in Field L, a primary auditory area that is a source of auditory input to HVc, were unaffected. While arousal acts as a negative regulator of HVc auditory responsiveness, the presence and variability of the responses observed in awake, alert birds suggests that other mechanisms, such as attention, may enhance auditory responsiveness. The interplay between behavioral state and sensory processing may regulate song system responsiveness according to the bird's behavioral and social context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878713     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00391.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  42 in total

1.  Neuronal stability and drift across periods of sleep: premotor activity patterns in a vocal control nucleus of adult zebra finches.

Authors:  Peter L Rauske; Zhiyi Chi; Amish S Dave; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Automatic reconstruction of physiological gestures used in a model of birdsong production.

Authors:  Santiago Boari; Yonatan Sanz Perl; Ana Amador; Daniel Margoliash; Gabriel B Mindlin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Song selectivity in the pallial-basal ganglia song circuit of zebra finches raised without tutor song exposure.

Authors:  Satoshi Kojima; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural processing of auditory feedback during vocal practice in a songbird.

Authors:  Georg B Keller; Richard H R Hahnloser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Linear and nonlinear auditory response properties of interneurons in a high-order avian vocal motor nucleus during wakefulness.

Authors:  Jonathan N Raksin; Christopher M Glaze; Sarah Smith; Marc F Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  A songbird forebrain area potentially involved in auditory discrimination and memory formation.

Authors:  Raphael Pinaud; Thomas A Terleph
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Transgenic songbirds offer an opportunity to develop a genetic model for vocal learning.

Authors:  R J Agate; B B Scott; B Haripal; C Lois; F Nottebohm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Neuron-specific cholinergic modulation of a forebrain song control nucleus.

Authors:  Stephen D Shea; Henner Koch; Daniel Baleckaitis; Jan-Marino Ramirez; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Auditory-vocal mirroring in songbirds.

Authors:  Richard Mooney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Sleep, off-line processing, and vocal learning.

Authors:  Daniel Margoliash; Marc F Schmidt
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.