Literature DB >> 12878688

Functional specialization within medial frontal cortex of the anterior cingulate for evaluating effort-related decisions.

Mark E Walton1, David M Bannerman, Karin Alterescu, Matthew F S Rushworth.   

Abstract

The rat medial frontal cortex (MFC) has been implicated in allowing animals to work harder to receive larger rewards. However, it is unknown what role the individual MFC regions [anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and prelimbic-infralimbic cortex (PL-IL)] play in such decision making. To investigate this, we trained rats on a T-maze cost-benefit task with two possible courses of action, shown previously to be affected by complete MFC lesions. One response involved climbing a 30 cm barrier to obtain a large quantity of reward (high cost-high reward), whereas the other had a lower energetic demand but also a smaller reward gain (low cost-low reward). Before surgery, all animals preferred to select the high cost-high reward option. However, after excitotoxic ACC lesions, there was a complete reversal of behavior, with the ACC group selecting the low cost-low reward response on nearly every trial. In contrast, both control animals and rats with PL-IL lesions continued to choose to climb the barrier for the larger reward. When the same rats were tested on a delayed match-to-sample paradigm however, it was the PL-IL group that was significantly impaired at learning the response rule, with the performance of ACC rats being comparable with controls. This double dissociation indicates that the ACC is the important region within the MFC when evaluating how much effort to expand for a specific reward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878688      PMCID: PMC6740644     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  176 in total

1.  Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala lesions result in suboptimal and dissociable reward choices on cue-guided effort in rats.

Authors:  Serena Ostrander; Victor A Cazares; Charissa Kim; Shauna Cheung; Isabel Gonzalez; Alicia Izquierdo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue?

Authors:  India Morrison; Donna Lloyd; Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Neil Roberts
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience.

Authors:  Michael T Treadway; David H Zald
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Inactivation of the prelimbic or infralimbic cortex impairs decision-making in the rat gambling task.

Authors:  Fiona D Zeeb; P J J Baarendse; L J M J Vanderschuren; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The dig task: a simple scent discrimination reveals deficits following frontal brain damage.

Authors:  Kris M Martens; Cole Vonder Haar; Blake A Hutsell; Michael R Hoane
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Pete C Trimmer; Daniel T Blumstein; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  The Mechanism of Hyperalgesia and Anxiety Induced by Remifentanil: Phosphorylation of GluR1 Receptors in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex.

Authors:  Jie Zeng; Sisi Li; Chao Zhang; Guijin Huang; Cong Yu
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.444

8.  Linking neural activity to complex decisions.

Authors:  Benjamin Hayden; Tatiana Pasternak
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Dopamine-associated cached values are not sufficient as the basis for action selection.

Authors:  Nick G Hollon; Monica M Arnold; Jerylin O Gan; Mark E Walton; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonism reverses the effects of dopamine receptor antagonism on instrumental output and effort-related choice in the rat: implications for studies of psychomotor slowing.

Authors:  Andrew M Farrar; Mariana Pereira; Francisco Velasco; Jörg Hockemeyer; Christa E Müller; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.