Literature DB >> 12878111

Indicators of empowerment and disempowerment in the subjective evaluation of the psychiatric treatment process by persons with severe and persistent mental illness: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Reinhold Kilian1, Iro Lindenbach, Uta Löbig, Matthias Uhle, Andreas Petscheleit, Matthias C Angermeyer.   

Abstract

Empowerment and disempowerment is studied in terms of the way persons with long and persistent schizophrenia evaluate their psychiatric outpatient treatment. One hundred persons with the diagnosis of schizophrenia (ICD-10 F 20.0) were interviewed about their perceptions and evaluation of the treatment process by means of problem-focused interviews. Transcribed interviews were subjected to qualitative content analysis. Relationships among the categories of the qualitative content analysis were analyzed by means of a homogeneity analysis. The latent dimension extracted by the homogeneity analysis could be interpreted as a quantitative measure of an empowered or a disempowered perception of the treatment process. As a result of the qualitative content analysis it was found that a majority of participants tend to describe their treatment as reduced to drug treatment and that they tend to notice only positive medication effects rather than mixed medication effects or positive effects of conversation and that they feel helpless or indifferent rather than actively involved in the treatment process. The impact of socio-demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics on the participants' location on a latent dimension called "empowerment" was examined by means of multiple regression analysis. General life satisfaction, negative symptoms and getting depot medication were positively associated with a more disempowered perception of the treatment process whereas positive symptoms, getting antidepressant medication and being treated in an outpatient clinic instead of a private practice were associated with a more empowered perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878111     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00490-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

1.  Differences in individual empowerment outcomes of socially disadvantaged women: effects of mode of participation and structural changes in a physical activity promotion program.

Authors:  Ulrike Röger; Alfred Rütten; Annika Frahsa; Karim Abu-Omar; Antony Morgan
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Empowerment and its associations in schizophrenia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Amlan Kusum Jana; Daya Ram; Samir Kumar Praharaj
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2014-05-03

3.  Perceived empowerment and the impact of negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life of persons with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Annabel Sandra Mueller-Stierlin; Friedrich Meixner; Jutta Lehle; Anne Kohlmann; Mara Schumacher; Stefanie Woehler; Anke Haensel; Sabrina Reuter; Katrin Herder; Nicole Bias; Thomas Becker; Reinhold Kilian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Assessing enablement in clinical practice: a systematic review of available instruments.

Authors:  Catherine Hudon; Denise St-Cyr Tribble; France Légaré; Gina Bravo; Martin Fortin; José Almirall
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Program of active aging in a rural Mexican community: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  María de la Luz Martínez-Maldonado; Elsa Correa-Muñoz; Víctor Manuel Mendoza-Núñez
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.