Literature DB >> 12877859

Return to work outcomes after work-related hand trauma: the role of causal attributions.

Mark D Rusch1, William W Dzwierzynski, James R Sanger, Nathan T Pruit, Andrea D Siewert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the relationship between workers' judgments of responsibility for their accidents (causal attributions) and work-site avoidance after work-related injuries.
METHODS: Ninety-two hand-injured workers referred for psychologic treatment of posttraumatic stress and depressive symptoms were assessed for their beliefs about the cause(s) of their accidents. Causal attributions were obtained before and after psychologic intervention.
RESULTS: Workers who blamed coworkers or equipment for their injuries were more likely to resist returning to former work activities than workers who judged themselves responsible for their accidents. In addition those with relatively minor injuries were as much at risk for work-site avoidance as those with more severe injuries. Age, gender, and length of employment with current employer were unrelated to avoidance.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the importance of causal attributions as potential predictors of work-site avoidance after traumatic work-related hand injuries, and support the risk for psychologic symptom development after less-severe injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12877859     DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(03)00178-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  12 in total

1.  Correlation of return to work outcomes and hand impairment measures among workers with traumatic hand injury.

Authors:  Jer-Hao Chang; Mingyi Wu; Chia-Ling Lee; Yue-Liang Guo; Haw-Yen Chiu
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

Review 2.  How well do we report on compensation systems in studies of return to work: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fiona J Clay; Janneke Berecki-Gisolf; Alex Collie
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03

3.  [Success of treatment in higher stages of pain chronification as well? An evaluation of the Mainz pain staging system based on the QUAST-analysis sample].

Authors:  M Hüppe; C Maier; H Gockel; M Zenz; J Frettlöh
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Recovering from traumatic occupational hand injury following surgery: a biopsychosocial perspective.

Authors:  Michelle Louise Roesler; Aleck Ian Glendon; Frances Veronica O'Callaghan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-12

5.  [Characterization of chronic pain patients in German pain centers : core data from more than 10,000 patients].

Authors:  J Frettlöh; C Maier; H Gockel; M Zenz; M Hüppe
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Changing to an outcome-focused program improves return to work outcomes.

Authors:  Pamela Joy Tschernetzki-Neilson; E Sharon Brintnell; Calvin Haws; Kathryn Graham
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-06

7.  The long-term prediction of return to work following serious accidental injuries: a follow up study.

Authors:  Urs Hepp; Hanspeter Moergeli; Stefan Buchi; Helke Bruchhaus-Steinert; Tom Sensky; Ulrich Schnyder
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Posttraumatic and depressive symptoms in victims of occupational accidents.

Authors:  Giulia Buodo; Caterina Novara; Marta Ghisi; Daniela Palomba
Journal:  Depress Res Treat       Date:  2012-05-29

9.  Determinants of return to work in patients with hand disorders and hand injuries.

Authors:  Lonneke Opsteegh; Heleen A Reinders-Messelink; Donna Schollier; Johan W Groothoff; Klaas Postema; Pieter U Dijkstra; Corry K van der Sluis
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-05-13

10.  Return to work following unintentional injury: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Urs Hepp; Ulrich Schnyder; Sofia Hepp-Beg; Josefina Friedrich-Perez; Niklaus Stulz; Hanspeter Moergeli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.