Literature DB >> 12877671

A new staging system for multiple myeloma patients based on the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) experience.

Joth L Jacobson1, Mohamad A Hussein, Bart Barlogie, Brian G M Durie, John J Crowley.   

Abstract

We aimed to develop and evaluate a staging system for multiple myeloma (MM) based on easily obtained laboratory measures. The Durie-Salmon stage is most commonly used and is an effective system of patient stratification for clinical trial research. However, the criteria are complex and many laboratory parameters are required to properly stage patients. In this analysis, we focused on two common measures with prognostic importance in MM: serum beta2 microglobulin (beta2m) and serum albumin. Pre-study data on 1555 previously untreated MM patients enrolled on four recent South-west Oncology Group (SWOG) phase III trials were used in the analysis. Staging models were developed and validated using regression tree methods for survival outcomes. SWOG stages were defined as: stage 1, beta2m < 2.5 mg/l (14% of patients, median overall survival of 55 months); stage 2, 2.5 </= beta2m < 5.5 (43% of patients, median overall survival of 40 months); stage 3, beta2m >/= 5.5 and albumin >/= 30 g/l (32% of patients, median overall survival of 24 months); and stage 4, beta2m >/= 5.5 and albumin < 30 g/l (11% of patients and median overall survival of 16 months). This staging scheme was also predictive of event-free survival, first-year mortality and long-term (>/= 5 years) event-free survival. We conclude that although the SWOG stage does not represent a new prognostic marker for MM (cytogenetics, FISH), it could provide a simple alternative to the Durie-Salmon stage for patients with previously untreated MM. Additional evaluation in other MM patient populations is needed to confirm results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12877671     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04456.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  19 in total

1.  The molecular classification of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Fenghuang Zhan; Yongsheng Huang; Simona Colla; James P Stewart; Ichiro Hanamura; Sushil Gupta; Joshua Epstein; Shmuel Yaccoby; Jeffrey Sawyer; Bart Burington; Elias Anaissie; Klaus Hollmig; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Guido Tricot; Frits van Rhee; Ronald Walker; Maurizio Zangari; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The albumin and monoclonal protein ratio as prognostic marker for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Katalin Kádár; Krisztina Wolf; Judit Tábori; István Karádi; Judit Várkonyi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Short or long survival in multiple myeloma. A simple method for determining the prognosis.

Authors:  Judit Várkonyi; Edina Bajzik; Adám Fazakas; Sándor Sipka; István Karádi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Comparison of serum beta 2-microglobulin and 24 hour urinary creatinine clearance as a prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jae-Pil Yun; Cheolwon Suh; Eunkyoung Lee; Jai Won Chang; Won Seok Yang; Jung Sik Park; Su-Kil Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Detection of oesophageal cancer biomarkers by plasma proteomic profiling of human cell line xenografts in response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Kelly; V Appleyard; K Murray; F Paulin; D Lamont; L Baker; S Suttie; D Exon; A Thompson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT: a review of diagnostic and prognostic features in multiple myeloma and related disorders.

Authors:  Franco Dammacco; Giuseppe Rubini; Cristina Ferrari; Angelo Vacca; Vito Racanelli
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Clinical value of new staging systems for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jung-Hye Choi; Jae-Hoon Yoon; Seong-Kyu Yang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Endothelial progenitor cells display clonal restriction in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marc Braunstein; Tayfun Ozçelik; Sevgi Bağişlar; Varsha Vakil; Eric L P Smith; Kezhi Dai; Cemaliye B Akyerli; Olcay A Batuman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  In non-transplant patients with multiple myeloma, the pre-treatment level of clonotypic cells predicts event-free survival.

Authors:  Kyle J Thulien; Andrew R Belch; Tony Reiman; Linda M Pilarski
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Poor outcomes for IgD multiple myeloma patients following high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation: a single center experience.

Authors:  Yong Pil Chong; Shin Kim; Ok Bae Ko; Ja Eun Koo; Danbi Lee; Sang Hyoung Park; Soo Jung Park; Daeho Lee; Sang We Kim; Cheolwon Suh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.