Literature DB >> 12877596

A comparison of balloon-mounted and self-expanding stents in the carotid arteries: immediate and long-term results of more than 500 patients.

Michael Henry Wholey1, Mark Henry Wholey, Walter A Tan, Gustave Eles, Chester Jarmolowski, Simon Cho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the rates of neurological complications and restenosis for balloon-mounted (BM) versus self-expanding (SE) stents deployed in the extracranial carotid arteries.
METHODS: Among 513 patients (312 men; mean age 71.3 years, range 27-91) who underwent carotid artery stent placement, 496 received 520 stents. The patients were followed with periodic duplex ultrasound examinations; angiography was performed whenever the duplex scan identified a >50% stenosis or symptoms warranted investigation. Periprocedural data on complications were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis, while intermediate-term neurological complications were compared in stented patients.
RESULTS: In the periprocedural period, there were 19 (3.7%) transient ischemic attacks, 10 (1.9%) minor strokes, 6 (1.2%) major strokes, and 8 (1.6%) deaths among the 513 patients. Five (1.0%) of the deaths were related to neurological complications (3.9% all stroke/neurological death rate). Among the 496 patients receiving 247 (48%) BM stents and 273 (52%) SE stents in 518 arteries, the all stroke/neurological death rates were 3.6% and 4.0%, respectively (p>0.05). During a mean follow-up of 20.6 months (range to 5.6 years), the 3-year freedom from all fatal and ipsilateral nonfatal strokes excluding the 30-day periprocedural period was 95.0% for BM stents and 95.2% for SE devices. Vessel patency (>50%) at 3 years was 92.0% in the population: 96.3% for BM stents and 83.7% for SE stents (p=0.0422).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of neurological complications following carotid stenting has been relatively low overall, and no differences were found relative to the type of stent deployed. Vessel patency was excellent at 3 years, with slightly better patency in BM stents, but because of their vulnerability to compression, they will not replace SE stents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12877596     DOI: 10.1177/152660280301000203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  4 in total

1.  Percutaneous endovascular management of atherosclerotic axillary artery stenosis: Report of 2 cases and review of literature.

Authors:  Rajesh Vijayvergiya; Mukesh Yadav; Anil Grover
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-26

2.  Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Leo H Bonati; Jörg Ederle; Dominick J H McCabe; Joanna Dobson; Roland L Featherstone; Peter A Gaines; Jonathan D Beard; Graham S Venables; Hugh S Markus; Andrew Clifton; Peter Sandercock; Martin M Brown
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 3.  Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  O Petr; W Brinjikji; M H Murad; B Glodny; G Lanzino
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Clinical trial of carotid artery stenting using dual-layer CASPER stent for carotid endarterectomy in patients at high and normal risk in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Imamura; Nobuyuki Sakai; Yasushi Matsumoto; Hiroshi Yamagami; Tomoaki Terada; Toshiyuki Fujinaka; Shinichi Yoshimura; Kenji Sugiu; Akira Ishii; Yuji Matsumaru; Takashi Izumi; Hidenori Oishi; Toshio Higashi; Koji Iihara; Naoya Kuwayama; Yasushi Ito; Masato Nakamura; Akio Hyodo; Kuniaki Ogasawara
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.836

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.