Literature DB >> 12876209

Comparison of two quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods for detecting HER2/neu amplification.

Alison Millson1, Arminda Suli, Leah Hartung, Steve Kunitake, Ann Bennett, Mary C Lowry Nordberg, Wedad Hanna, Carl T Wittwer, Arun Seth, Elaine Lyon.   

Abstract

Two quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for HER2/neu gene quantification were evaluated for implementation into a clinical laboratory. Assays were developed using sequence-specific hybridization probes to detect a target (HER2/neu) and a reference gene (beta-globin) simultaneously. One method utilizes real-time quantification while the second uses internal competitors and melting curves to quantify the unknown sample. These two methods were evaluated using three cell lines and 97 breast tumor samples. Two hundred ninety-four samples were subsequently evaluated using the real-time quantification and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Real-time PCR gave HER2/neu gene doses of 10 for SKBR3 and 2 for T47D while the competitive PCR gave doses of 11 for SKBR3 and 2.2 for T47D. Both methods produced coefficients of variation (CV) of less than 3% for within-run and less than 6% for between-run analysis. Examination of 97 breast tumors found a correlation of r = 0.974 between the two methods. IHC and PCR results agreed for 234 of the subsequent 294 samples analyzed (79% concordance). A subset of ten discrepant samples was microdissected. After microdissection all ten were positive by PCR, thus resolving the discrepancy. Real-time quantification and microdissection is useful clinically for HER2/neu quantification. Its ease of use and broad dynamic range allows screening for amplification of HER2/neu.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12876209      PMCID: PMC1907331          DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60471-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  23 in total

1.  Inhibition of c-erbB-2 oncogene expression by estrogens in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  C Dati; S Antoniotti; D Taverna; I Perroteau; M De Bortoli
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  DNA extraction with organic solvents in gel barrier tubes.

Authors:  S M Thomas; R F Moreno; L L Tilzer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  R K Saiki; S Scharf; F Faloona; K B Mullis; G T Horn; H A Erlich; N Arnheim
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D J Slamon; W Godolphin; L A Jones; J A Holt; S G Wong; D E Keith; W J Levin; S G Stuart; J Udove; A Ullrich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Overexpression of the c-erbB-2 protein in human breast tumor cell lines.

Authors:  N E Hynes; H A Gerber; S Saurer; B Groner
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  Her-2/neu expression in node-negative breast cancer: direct tissue quantitation by computerized image analysis and association of overexpression with increased risk of recurrent disease.

Authors:  M F Press; M C Pike; V R Chazin; G Hung; J A Udove; M Markowicz; J Danyluk; W Godolphin; M Sliwkowski; R Akita
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Prognostic and predictive relevance of c-erbB-2 and ras expression in node positive and negative breast cancer.

Authors:  M Giai; R Roagna; R Ponzone; M De Bortoli; C Dati; P Sismondi
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  Tyrosine kinase receptor with extensive homology to EGF receptor shares chromosomal location with neu oncogene.

Authors:  L Coussens; T L Yang-Feng; Y C Liao; E Chen; A Gray; J McGrath; P H Seeburg; T A Libermann; J Schlessinger; U Francke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  HER-2/neu amplification predicts poor survival in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  A Borg; A K Tandon; H Sigurdsson; G M Clark; M Fernö; S A Fuqua; D Killander; W L McGuire
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  C-erbB2 mRNA expression in human breast tumours: comparison with c-erbB2 DNA amplification and correlation with prognosis.

Authors:  H C Parkes; K Lillycrop; A Howell; R K Craig
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization with other methodologies for HER2 status assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Nadia Dandachi
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.611

2.  LightCycler technology in molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Elaine Lyon; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 3.  HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  Angela N Bartley; Mary Kay Washington; Christina B Ventura; Nofisat Ismaila; Carol Colasacco; Al B Benson; Alfredo Carrato; Margaret L Gulley; Dhanpat Jain; Sanjay Kakar; Helen J Mackay; Catherine Streutker; Laura Tang; Megan Troxell; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Accurate breast cancer diagnosis through real-time PCR her-2 gene quantification using immunohistochemically-identified biopsies.

Authors:  Gretel Mendoza; Amelia Portillo; Jorge Olmos-Soto
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  A single-tube quantitative assay for mRNA levels of hormonal and growth factor receptors in breast cancer specimens.

Authors:  Ayuko A Iverson; Cheryl Gillett; Paul Cane; Christopher D Santini; Thomas M Vess; Lauren Kam-Morgan; Alice Wang; Marcia Eisenberg; Charles M Rowland; Janice J Hessling; Samuel E Broder; John J Sninsky; Andrew Tutt; Steven Anderson; Sheng-Yung P Chang
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  A transductionally retargeted adenoviral vector for virotherapy of Her2/neu-expressing prostate cancer.

Authors:  M K Magnusson; R Kraaij; R M Leadley; C M A De Ridder; W M van Weerden; K A J Van Schie; M Van der Kroeg; R C Hoeben; N J Maitland; L Lindholm
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.695

7.  Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation.

Authors:  Alexandra S Whale; Jim F Huggett; Simon Cowen; Valerie Speirs; Jacqui Shaw; Stephen Ellison; Carole A Foy; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Real-time PCR complements immunohistochemistry in the determination of HER-2/neu status in breast cancer.

Authors:  Andreea Nistor; Peter H Watson; Norman Pettigrew; Karim Tabiti; Angelika Dawson; Yvonne Myal
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-01-18

9.  ABCC5, ERCC2, XPA and XRCC1 transcript abundance levels correlate with cisplatin chemoresistance in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  David A Weaver; Erin L Crawford; Kristy A Warner; Fadel Elkhairi; Sadik A Khuder; James C Willey
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Improving validation methods for molecular diagnostics: application of Bland-Altman, Deming and simple linear regression analyses in assay comparison and evaluation for next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Maksym Misyura; Mahadeo A Sukhai; Vathany Kulasignam; Tong Zhang; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Tracy L Stockley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.