BACKGROUND: Based on differences in national health care system characteristics such as the gatekeeping role of GPs (at the macrolevel) and on diverging GP and patient characteristics (at the microlevel), communication may differ between countries. Knowledge of the influence of these characteristics on doctor-patient communication will be important for setting European health care policies. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were (i) to compare doctor-patient communication in general practice between European countries; and (ii) to investigate the influence of the gatekeeping system and GP and patient characteristics on doctor-patient communication in general practice. METHODS: Fifteen patients per GP (in total 2825 patients) of 190 GPs in six European countries were included. Participating countries were The Netherlands, Spain, the UK (gatekeeping countries), Belgium, Germany and Switzerland (non-gatekeeping countries). Data were collected by means of patient and GP questionnaires and observation of videotaped consultations, and analysed by one-way and multilevel, multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Differences in communication between countries were found in: affective and instrumental behaviour; biomedical and psychosocial talk; GPs' patient-directed gaze; and consultation length. The study showed that GPs' gatekeeping role (with registered patients) was less important for doctor-patient communication than was expected. Patient characteristics such as gender, age, having psychosocial problems, and familiarity between the doctor and the patient were the most important in explaining differences in communication. CONCLUSION: The gatekeeping role of GPs is hardly important in explaining doctor-patient communication. The relationship is more complex than expected. Patient and GP characteristics are more important. Cultural factors should be included in future studies.
BACKGROUND: Based on differences in national health care system characteristics such as the gatekeeping role of GPs (at the macrolevel) and on diverging GP and patient characteristics (at the microlevel), communication may differ between countries. Knowledge of the influence of these characteristics on doctor-patient communication will be important for setting European health care policies. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were (i) to compare doctor-patient communication in general practice between European countries; and (ii) to investigate the influence of the gatekeeping system and GP and patient characteristics on doctor-patient communication in general practice. METHODS: Fifteen patients per GP (in total 2825 patients) of 190 GPs in six European countries were included. Participating countries were The Netherlands, Spain, the UK (gatekeeping countries), Belgium, Germany and Switzerland (non-gatekeeping countries). Data were collected by means of patient and GP questionnaires and observation of videotaped consultations, and analysed by one-way and multilevel, multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Differences in communication between countries were found in: affective and instrumental behaviour; biomedical and psychosocial talk; GPs' patient-directed gaze; and consultation length. The study showed that GPs' gatekeeping role (with registered patients) was less important for doctor-patient communication than was expected. Patient characteristics such as gender, age, having psychosocial problems, and familiarity between the doctor and the patient were the most important in explaining differences in communication. CONCLUSION: The gatekeeping role of GPs is hardly important in explaining doctor-patient communication. The relationship is more complex than expected. Patient and GP characteristics are more important. Cultural factors should be included in future studies.
Authors: Richard D Neal; Nasreen Ali; Karl Atkin; Victoria L Allgar; Shahid Ali; Tim Coleman Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Pia Bastholm Rahmner; Lars L Gustafsson; Inger Holmström; Urban Rosenqvist; Göran Tomson Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Atie van den Brink-Muinen; Sandra M van Dulmen; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Adriaan Ph Visser; François G Schellevis; Jozien M Bensing Journal: Health Expect Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Jennifer H Lingler; Lynn M Martire; Amanda E Hunsaker; Michele G Greene; Mary Amanda Dew; Richard Schulz Journal: J Am Acad Nurse Pract Date: 2009-07
Authors: France Légaré; Nora Moumjid-Ferdjaoui; Renée Drolet; Dawn Stacey; Martin Härter; Hilda Bastian; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Francine Borduas; Cathy Charles; Angela Coulter; Sophie Desroches; Gwendolyn Friedrich; Amiram Gafni; Ian D Graham; Michel Labrecque; Annie LeBlanc; Jean Légaré; Mary Politi; Joan Sargeant; Richard Thomson Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.355