Ron Winkens1, Hanny Nelissen-Arets, Ellen Stobberingh. 1. Transmural Care Unit Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. ron.winkens@hag.unimaas.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: So far, the validity of urine dipslides has been studied only under optimal conditions, which may not reflect the situation in daily practice. OBJECTIVE: We studied the validity of the urine dipslide as performed under daily practice conditions and assessed the influence of the incubation period (24 h versus 48 h) on validity. METHODS: Fresh urine samples of patients with signs/symptoms of a possible urinary tract infection (UTI) were examined in general practice via a nitrite test, a urine sediment and a dipslide. A second dipslide was inoculated and sent to the hospital microbiology laboratory for culture. This culture acted as gold standard. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the tests performed. RESULTS: Of the 273 patient episodes included, 62% had a UTI (166 of 268 cultures). The sensitivity of the dipslide performed in daily general practice was 73% and the specificity was 94%. CONCLUSION: The validity of the dipslide read under practice conditions is lower than under optimal conditions. Actions to improve performance are needed. Nonetheless, using the dipslide instead of the sediment as a second step after the nitrite test would improve the diagnostic work-up of UTI.
BACKGROUND: So far, the validity of urine dipslides has been studied only under optimal conditions, which may not reflect the situation in daily practice. OBJECTIVE: We studied the validity of the urine dipslide as performed under daily practice conditions and assessed the influence of the incubation period (24 h versus 48 h) on validity. METHODS: Fresh urine samples of patients with signs/symptoms of a possible urinary tract infection (UTI) were examined in general practice via a nitrite test, a urine sediment and a dipslide. A second dipslide was inoculated and sent to the hospital microbiology laboratory for culture. This culture acted as gold standard. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the tests performed. RESULTS: Of the 273 patient episodes included, 62% had a UTI (166 of 268 cultures). The sensitivity of the dipslide performed in daily general practice was 73% and the specificity was 94%. CONCLUSION: The validity of the dipslide read under practice conditions is lower than under optimal conditions. Actions to improve performance are needed. Nonetheless, using the dipslide instead of the sediment as a second step after the nitrite test would improve the diagnostic work-up of UTI.
Authors: Bas S H J Zegers; Pauline L H Winkler-Seinstra; Cuno S P M Uiterwaal; Tom V P M de Jong; Jan L L Kimpen; Catharine C E de Jong-de Vos van Steenwijk Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Bart J Knottnerus; Suzanne E Geerlings; Eric P Moll van Charante; Gerben Ter Riet Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Elya E Moore; Stephen E Hawes; Delia Scholes; Edward J Boyko; James P Hughes; Stephan D Fihn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Bas S H J Zegers; Cuno C S P M Uiterwaal; Carla C Verpoorten; Myleen M H Christiaens; Jan J L L Kimpen; Catharine C C E de Jong-de Vos van Steenwijk; Jan J D van Gool Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2012-10-20 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Bart J Knottnerus; Patrick J E Bindels; Suzanne E Geerlings; Eric P Moll van Charante; Gerben ter Riet Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 2.497