Literature DB >> 12876028

Vascular complications after living related liver transplantation: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography.

Bong Soo Kim1, Tae Kyoung Kim, Dong Jin Jung, Jung Hoon Kim, In Young Bae, Kyu-Bo Sung, Pyo Nyun Kim, Hyun Kwon Ha, Sung Gyu Lee, Moon-Gyu Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography for detection of vascular complications in patients who have undergone living related liver transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients who underwent living related liver transplantation were evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography. All MR angiograms were assessed for patency of the hepatic artery and the portal vein using a four-point scale (grades I-IV). The results were correlated with conventional angiography (n = 23) and clinical follow-up with Doppler sonography (n = 53) for more than 6 months.
RESULTS: Seventy-three of 76 MR angiography procedures were technically adequate. When grades III (focal narrowing [> 50%] at the anastomotic site) and IV (abrupt cutoff at the anastomotic site with nonvisualization of the right [or left] hepatic artery distal to the anastomosis) were regarded as the diagnostic criteria for hepatic artery stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MR angiography were 100%, 74%, 29%, 100%, and 77%, respectively. In the portal vein, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MR angiography were 100%, 84%, 35%, 100%, and 85%, respectively, when grades III (narrowing [> 50%] without poststenotic dilatation) and IV (narrowing [> 50%] with poststenotic dilatation) were defined as criteria for portal vein stenosis.
CONCLUSION: MR angiography was sensitive but not specific in the detection of significant vascular stenosis after living related liver transplantation. However, normal MR angiography findings reliably exclude the possibility of significant stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12876028     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

Review 1.  Iatrogenic-related transplant injuries: the role of the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Alexander Copelan; Daniel George; Baljendra Kapoor; Hahn Vu Nghiem; Jonathan M Lorenz; Brian Erly; Weiping Wang
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Transplant Hepatic Artery Stenosis: Endovascular Treatment and Complications.

Authors:  Christopher Molvar; Ross Ogilvie; Deep Aggarwal; Marc Borge
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Stent placement versus angioplasty for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplant: a meta-analysis of case series.

Authors:  Nassir Rostambeigi; David Hunter; Sue Duval; Srinath Chinnakotla; Jafar Golzarian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Benign Portal Vein Stenosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Katsuhisa Ohgi; Teiichi Sugiura; Yusuke Yamamoto; Yukiyasu Okamura; Takaaki Ito; Ryo Ashida; Takeshi Aramaki; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Vascular applications of ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Andrew W Bowman; Cory R Gooch; Lauren F Alexander; Madhura A Desai; Candice W Bolan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-22

6.  Real-time and Doppler US after pediatric segmental liver transplantation : I. Portal vein stenosis.

Authors:  Lisa Suzuki; Ilka R S de Oliveira; Azzo Widman; Nelson E M Gibelli; Nelson E M Gibeli; Francisco C Carnevale; João G Maksoud; Anne M Hubbard; Giovanni G Cerri
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-01-23

7.  Percutaneous portal venoplasty and stenting for anastomotic stenosis after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Bao-Jie Wei; Ren-You Zhai; Jian-Feng Wang; Ding-Ke Dai; Ping Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Multimodality postoperative imaging of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Giulia A Zamboni; Ivan Pedrosa; Jonathan B Kruskal; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with SonoVue in the evaluation of postoperative complications in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  G Bonini; G Pezzotta; C Morzenti; R Agazzi; R Nani
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2007-06-13

Review 10.  Perfusion CT imaging of the liver: review of clinical applications.

Authors:  Hayri Oğul; Mecit Kantarcı; Berhan Genç; Berhan Pirimoğlu; Neşat Cullu; Yeşim Kızrak; Omer Yılmaz; Nevzat Karabulut
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.