Literature DB >> 12875757

Clinical outcome of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in the two months following coronary stenting.

Stephanie H Wilson1, Panayotis Fasseas, James L Orford, Ryan J Lennon, Terese Horlocker, Nina E Charnoff, Steven Melby, Peter B Berger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the frequency and timing of complications at our institution when surgery was performed within two months of coronary stent placement.
BACKGROUND: The optimal delay following coronary stent placement prior to non-cardiac surgery is unknown.
METHODS: We analyzed the Mayo Clinic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Surgical databases between 1990 and 2000 and identified 207 patients who underwent surgery in the two months following successful coronary stent placement.
RESULTS: Eight patients (4.0%) died or suffered a myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. All 8 patients were among the 168 patients (4.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1 to 9.2) undergoing surgery six weeks after stent placement; the frequency of these events ranged from 3.8% to 7.1% per week during each of the six weeks. No events occurred in the 39 patients undergoing surgery seven to nine weeks after stent placement (0%, 95% CI 0.0 to 9.0).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, whenever possible, non-cardiac surgery should be delayed six weeks after stent placement, by which time stents are generally endothelialized, and a course of antiplatelet therapy to prevent stent thrombosis has been completed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12875757     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00622-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  48 in total

Review 1.  Advances in nuclear cardiology: preoperative risk stratification.

Authors:  Kenneth A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Previous percutaneous coronary intervention increases morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Gaurav S Mehta; Damien J LaPar; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; John A Kern; Irving L Kron; Gilbert R Upchurch; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  [Antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting and its importance in total joint arthroplasty].

Authors:  N Harrasser; T Harnoss; F Brettner; F Liska; M Pauschinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Current aspects of anesthetic management in urological patients].

Authors:  O Groll; J Peters
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Advances in nuclear imaging for preoperative risk assessment.

Authors:  Jonathan Eddinger; Mylan C Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Surveillance and prevention of major perioperative ischemic cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a review.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Lee Goldman; Salim Yusuf; Ken Gilbert; Kate Leslie; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Stents or surgery: the case for stents.

Authors:  James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

Review 8.  The risk of drug-eluting stent thrombosis with noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Emmanouil S Brilakis; Subhash Banerjee; Peter B Berger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Coronary artery disease: to cath or not to cath? When and how best to cath: those are the remaining questions.

Authors:  Roberta Rossini; Giuseppe Musumeci; Eliano Pio Navarese; Giuseppe Tarantini
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-02-17

Review 10.  How to manage patients with need for antiplatelet therapy in the setting of (un-)planned surgery.

Authors:  Helge Möllmann; Holger M Nef; Christian W Hamm; Albrecht Elsässer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.