Literature DB >> 1287573

Psychophysical features of the transition from pure heat perception to heat pain perception.

S Lautenbacher1, A Möltner, F Strain.   

Abstract

The psychophysical features of the transition from the pure heat to the heat pain range were studied in 25 healthy subjects (mean age 28.8 years). Thirty short heat stimuli from -1.6 degrees C to +1.6 degrees C relative to the pain threshold were applied to the thenar of the left hand with an apparatus containing a Peltier thermode (nine different temperatures at 0.4 degrees C intervals). The subjects rated the sensation intensity on a visual analogue scale. The resulting stimulus/sensation intensity relations could be explained equally well (same goodness of fit) by a model with a power function (PF) and by a model with two linear regression lines (TLR), one for stimulus intensities below and one for those above the pain threshold and intersecting at the pain threshold. The slopes of the TLR model were significantly larger above the pain threshold than below it. The PF model produced exponents between 1.8 and 1.9. We conclude that to describe the transition area, it is sufficient to use simple linear models for both the pure heat and the heat pain ranges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1287573     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  19 in total

1.  A scale of apparent intensity of electric shock.

Authors:  S S STEVENS; A S CARTON; G M SHICKMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-10

2.  Magnitude estimation of warmth: intra- and intersubject variability.

Authors:  R Refinetti
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-07

3.  Integration of noxious stimulation across separate somatosensory communications systems: a functional theory of pain.

Authors:  D Algom; N Raphaeli; L Cohen-Raz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Thermally induced pain, the Dol scale, and the psychophysical power law.

Authors:  E R Adair; J C Stevens; L E Marks
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1968-06

5.  Psychophysical detection and pain ratings of incremental thermal stimuli: a comparison with nociceptor responses in humans.

Authors:  C J Robinson; H E Torebjörk; R H LaMotte
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-09-05       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Functional measurement scales of painful electric shocks.

Authors:  B Jones; M Gwynn
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-02

7.  A psychophysical analysis of experimential factors that selectively influence the affective dimension of pain.

Authors:  Donald D Price; James J Barrell; Richard H Gracely
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  A simultaneous comparison of fentanyl's analgesic effects on experimental and clinical pain.

Authors:  Donald D Price; Stephen W Harkins; Amir Rafii; Catherine Price
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Comparison of human pain sensation and flexion withdrawal evoked by noxious radiant heat.

Authors:  I G Campbell; E Carstens; L R Watkins
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Comparison of responses of warm and nociceptive C-fiber afferents in monkey with human judgments of thermal pain.

Authors:  R H LaMotte; J N Campbell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differential Classical Conditioning of the Nocebo Effect: Increasing Heat-Pain Perception without Verbal Suggestions.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Bräscher; Dieter Kleinböhl; Rupert Hölzl; Susanne Becker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-13

2.  Behavioral and electrodermal data on implicit nocebo conditioning using supraliminally presented visual stimuli.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Bräscher; Michael Witthöft
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-10-22

3.  Serotonin-1A receptor polymorphism (rs6295) associated with thermal pain perception.

Authors:  Fredrik Lindstedt; Bianka Karshikoff; Martin Schalling; Caroline Olgart Höglund; Martin Ingvar; Mats Lekander; Eva Kosek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.