Literature DB >> 12875404

Aerosol organic-mass-to-organic-carbon ratio measurements.

Lynn M Russell1.   

Abstract

The ratio of organic-mass-to-organic-carbon, typically taken to be between 1.4 and 1.7, has an uncertainty higher than 50%, but this value is used in every measurement to date of the organic fraction of atmospheric particles. A recently developed technique with errors reduced to between 9% and 33% provides measurements of this ratio that show its large variability for samples measured in northeastern Asia and the Caribbean. The technique uses functional groups measured by FTIR spectroscopy to estimate composite organic carbon from the number of carbon bonds present and organic mass from the molecular mass of each functional group associated with the measured bond type. The molecular masses associated with each functional group are not unique and do not account for highly branched organic compositions. For the organic mixtures described by the less than 20% of atmospheric organic mass that has been speciated by GCMS, the theoretical discrepancy in the composite organic-mass-to-organic-carbon ratio is less than 5%. The measured ratios for submicron particle samples are skewed: over 90% of the measurements collected lie between 1.2 and 1.6, with mean values just below 1.4. This variability highlights the importance of measured organic-mass-to-organic-carbon ratios to reduce the uncertainty associated with atmospheric organic aerosol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12875404     DOI: 10.1021/es026123w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Exposure assessment, chemical characterization and source identification of PM2.5 for school children and industrial downwind residents in Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Jia Wang; Senchao Lai; Zhaoyue Ke; Yingyi Zhang; Shasha Yin; Junyu Zheng
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Urban and suburban aerosol in Yokohama, Japan: a comprehensive chemical characterization.

Authors:  Md Firoz Khan; Yuichiro Shirasuna; Koichiro Hirano; Shigeki Masunaga
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Apportioned primary and secondary organic aerosol during pollution events of DISCOVER-AQ Houston.

Authors:  Subin Yoon; Stephanie M Ortiz; Adelaide E Clark; Tate E Barrett; Sascha Usenko; Rachelle M Duvall; Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz; Jeffrey K Bean; Cameron B Faxon; James H Flynn; Barry L Lefer; Yu Jun Leong; Robert J Griffin; Rebecca J Sheesley
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review.

Authors:  Judith C Chow; Douglas H Lowenthal; L-W Antony Chen; Xiaoliang Wang; John G Watson
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.763

5.  Chemical Characterization and Seasonality of Ambient Particles (PM2.5) in the City Centre of Addis Ababa.

Authors:  Worku Tefera; Abera Kumie; Kiros Berhane; Frank Gilliland; Alexandra Lai; Piyaporn Sricharoenvech; Jonathan Samet; Jonathan Patz; James J Schauer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.