Literature DB >> 12874797

Comparison of developmental capacity for intra- and interspecies cloned cat (Felis catus) embryos.

Duan-Cheng Wen1, Cai-Xia Yang, Yong Cheng, Jin-Song Li, Zhong-Hua Liu, Qing-Yuan Sun, Jia-Xin Zhang, Lei Lei, Yu-Qi Wu, Zhao-Hui Kou, Da-Yuan Chen.   

Abstract

Interspecies nuclear transfer is an invaluable tool for studying nucleus-cytoplasm interactions; and at the same time, it provides a possible alternative to clone animals whose oocytes are difficult to obtain. In the present study, we investigated the possibility of cloning cat embryos using rabbit oocytes, and compared the developmental capacity; the timing of embryogenesis of the cat-rabbit cloned embryos with that of the cat-cat or the rabbit-rabbit cloned embryos. When cultured in M199, the rate of blastocyst formation of the cat-rabbit embryos was 6.9%, which was not significantly different than that of the cat-cat embryos (10.5%). However, the rate of blastocyst formation of rabbit-rabbit embryos (22.9%) was significantly greater than that of both the cat-rabbit and the cat-cat embryos (P < 0.05). The timing of the first three cleavages for the cat-rabbit embryos was similar to that of the rabbit-rabbit embryos, but significantly faster than that of the cat-cat embryos (P < 0.05), while the time to form blastocysts was similar to that of cat-cat embryos, but significantly slower than that of the rabbit-rabbit embryos (P < 0.05). Both M199 and SOF medium were evaluated for culturing cat-rabbit embryos; the rate of blastocyst formation in SOF (14.5%) was significantly greater than that in M199 (6.9%) (P < 0.05). These results demonstrate that: (1) the cat-rabbit embryos possess equal developmental capacity as cat-cat embryos; (2) the timing of the first three cleavages for the cat-rabbit embryos is recipient-specific, while the time to form blastocysts is donor nucleus-specific; and (3) SOF medium may be beneficial to overcome the morula-to-blastocyst block for cat-rabbit cloned embryos. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12874797     DOI: 10.1002/mrd.10333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  6 in total

1.  Interspecies nuclear transfer using fibroblasts from leopard, tiger, and lion ear piece collected postmortem as donor cells and rabbit oocytes as recipients.

Authors:  Uma Mahesh Yelisetti; Suman Komjeti; Venu Charan Katari; Shivaji Sisinthy; Sambasiva Rao Brahmasani
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 2.  Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer and preliminary data for horse-cow/mouse iSCNT.

Authors:  R Tayfur Tecirlioglu; Jitong Guo; Alan O Trounson
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Specific gene-regulation networks during the pre-implantation development of the pig embryo as revealed by deep sequencing.

Authors:  Suying Cao; Jianyong Han; Jun Wu; Qiuyan Li; Shichao Liu; Wei Zhang; Yangli Pei; Xiaoan Ruan; Zhonghua Liu; Xumin Wang; Bing Lim; Ning Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  ARTs in Wild Felid Conservation Programmes in Poland and in the World.

Authors:  Joanna Kochan; Wojciech Niżański; Nei Moreira; Zalmir Silvino Cubas; Agnieszka Nowak; Sylwia Prochowska; Agnieszka Partyka; Wiesława Młodawska; Józef Skotnicki
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 5.  Choosing a culture medium for SCNT and iSCNT reconstructed embryos: from domestic to wildlife species.

Authors:  A Cordova; W A King; G F Mastromonaco
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2017-11-10

6.  Production of second-generation cloned cats by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  X J Yin; H S Lee; X F Yu; L H Kim; H D Shin; S J Cho; E G Choi; I K Kong
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.740

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.