Literature DB >> 12874612

Accuracy of telemedical home blood pressure measurement in the diagnosis of hypertension.

D S Møller1, A Dideriksen, S Sørensen, L D Madsen, E B Pedersen.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the accuracy of clinic blood pressure (CBP) and telemedical home blood pressure (HBP) measurement in the diagnosis of hypertension in primary care. The study subjects were 411 patients with average CBP > or =140 mmHg systolic or > or =90 mmHg diastolic, who performed telemedical HBP measurement (5 days, four times daily) and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring in random order. Main outcome measure was the agreement of CBP and HBP with daytime ABP. CBP was much higher than daytime ABP and average HBP (P<0.001) with no difference between the latter two. The correlation between CBP and ABP was weak (systolic: r=0.499, diastolic: r=0.543), whereas strong correlations existed between HBP and ABP (systolic: r=0.847, diastolic: r=0.812). A progressive improvement in the strength of the linear regression between average HBP of single days and ABP was obtained from day 1 to day 4, with no further benefit obtained on the fifth day. The HBP readings taken at noon and in the afternoon showed significantly stronger correlations with ABP than the blood pressures measured in the morning and in the evening. In conclusion, the accuracy of telemedical HBP measurement was substantially better than that of CBP in the diagnosis of hypertension in primary care. HBP most accurately reflected ABP on the fourth day of monitoring, and the readings at noon and in the afternoon seemed to be most accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12874612     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of home blood pressure and its possible practical application.

Authors:  Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 2.  Hypertension Survey in Italy: Novel Findings from the Campania Salute Network.

Authors:  Eugenio Stabile; Raffaele Izzo; Francesco Rozza; Maria Angela Losi; Nicola De Luca; Bruno Trimarco
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-07-01

Review 3.  How Digital Health Can Be Applied for Preventing and Managing Hypertension.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Dario Pellegrini; Camilla Torlasco
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Nonadherence to Recommended Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Jack Levy; Linda M Gerber; Xian Wu; Samuel J Mann
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Construction of an odds model of coronary heart disease using published information: the Cardiovascular Health Improvement Model (CHIME).

Authors:  Christopher J Martin; Paul Taylor; Henry W W Potts
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.